Browse over 9,000 car reviews

Mazda 2


Suzuki Swift

Summary

Mazda 2

The entry-point into one of Australia's most popular brands has been around for almost 10 years in its current generation, but the Mazda2 has had a refresh.

Possibly for the last time in its current lifespan, the small hatchback gets a facelift to remain appealing, Mazda hopes, to first-car-buyers.

Mazda's up against not only direct rivals, like the Suzuki Swift and Toyota Yaris, but also the shifting market.

Mazda has sold just over 3500 Mazda2s so far this year, but almost 11,000 CX-3 small SUVs, the latter based on our friend here's platform.

It's a name with a little over two decades behind it, but can it be a first-car-favourite in an increasingly difficult small car market?

Safety rating
Engine Type1.5L
Fuel TypePetrol
Fuel Efficiency5.4L/100km
Seating5 seats

Suzuki Swift

You’ve set a new-car budget ceiling of $30,000. Your preference is for a small five-door hatch rather than the ubiquitous ‘compact SUV’ and with fuel price surges now a painfully regular part of life you like the idea of a hybrid. 

Well, here are two well-credentialed, just-released contenders fitting that description ready to vie for your attention.

MG’s all-new MG3 replaces a model that’s dominated the light car segment in recent years and brings a new hybrid variant to the party. And Suzuki's Swift is an Aussie small car favourite with this recently launched sixth-generation version adding a mild-hybrid to the range.

We’ll get into how these city-sized newcomers shape up in terms of performance, economy, safety, practicality, value and more. So, stay with us to see which one has the best chance of filling that small car-sized space on your driveway.

Safety rating
Engine Type1.5L
Fuel TypeHybrid with Premium Unleaded
Fuel Efficiency4.3L/100km
Seating5 seats

Verdict

Mazda 27.9/10

While Mazda's insistence that the Mazda2 is a 'first-car' could be very limited by the incomes of most teenagers or early-20s city-dwellers, the starting price being close enough to $20,000 for a dynamically enjoyable and convenient small car isn't to be scoffed at.

The new styling of the Mazda2 is well executed, and as an alternative to small SUVs (which continue to become more popular) it's a sensible option, especially considering its efficiency and ease of use.

The lower specifications in the range are probably the best in terms of value, as even the features on the higher grades aren't groundbreaking, and the Pure SP definitely exudes the most style cred.


Suzuki Swift/10

This is close, with things like safety and these cars’ amazing fuel efficiency too close to call. 

In terms of performance, practicality and the ownership package, the MG has the edge. But not by much, and when it comes to driving comfort and dynamics and critically, value for money, the Suzuki takes the lead.

Your particular priorities may drive a different decision, but in this head-to-head our nod goes to the Swift Hybrid Plus.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Rating

7.9

8.0

Design

Mazda 2

Aside from the Pure SP, the Mazda2's styling changes are subtle. Mazda's design team aimed to move the model's looks slightly away from the previous ‘premium' chrome-adorned look to a sportier and more ‘aggressive' style.

A redesigned front bumper and mesh grille, with the rear's nip and tuck being more subtle, don't need to do much to keep the hatchback looking fresh. Despite being almost a decade old, the Mazda2 looks, to some extent, like it could be a new generation.

The Pure SP in particular is a highlight, with the blocked grille evoking some ‘electrification' vibes, while the coloured-accent treatment at the front and rear of most variants is a welcome addition for something different.

The range of differing wheels is also a plus point for the Mazda2 range, with each model having its own distinct characteristics.

Inside, the Pure SP also gets a stand-out panel across the dash in a lighter colour like mint, while others get different seat trims and colour accents in places like the vent surrounds.

New colours for the range are 'Aero Grey Metallic' and 'Air Stream Blue Metallic'.


Suzuki Swift

In terms of exterior design the MG is a mix of hard character lines and sharp angles, for example in the headlights and tail-lights as well as vents front and rear.

Suzuki follows an evolutionary approach when it comes to the Swift’s design. Cover this latest version’s badges and thanks to its chunky proportions and upright stance, any half-decent car-spotter will still pick it.

A relatively high waistline gives the Swift a solid look while our test car’s two-tone premium ‘Frontier Blue Pearl’ paint (an $1145 option) with black turret enhances the signature ‘floating roof’ effect.

The MG3’s interior is clean and simple with the tone set by a twin-screen setup; a 10.25-inch multimedia display in the centre and a 7.0-inch instrument cluster in front of the driver.

But it’s dark, from the roof lining, to the dash, to the seats. And in this part of the market you can forget about soft-touch cabin materials, the plastics are hard save for some padding across the centre level of the dash.

By comparison the Swift’s interior is conventional with a relatively small media screen artificially enlarged by a broad gloss plastic frame. Analogue instruments, albeit with a multi-function digital screen in the centre (including a digital speedometer) look dated by comparison and the layered dash treatment appears fussy next to the MG’s layout.

Some grey and cream elements lighten the tone but, again, it’s a world of hard plastic surfaces inside the Suzuki.

Always a subjective call. We’re giving the design gong to the MG for its more contemporary approach, but I like the Swift, too, analogue instruments and all.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Rating

8.0

7.0

Practicality

Mazda 2

The Mazda2's interior is mostly unchanged through the facelift, with the car's overall dimensions unchanged and not affecting space for its occupants.

Up front, the two seats are comfortable for adults and arm, shoulder, and head room is ample.

Storage space for drinks, phones, or small bags and wallets is sufficient, though not quite road-trip-worthy.

In the rear seats, adults will find enough space to be comfortable for short trips but might get a little restless after a while.

Headroom when sitting upright is tight for anyone around 182cm (six-feet) tall, and a lack of armrest and little storage save for the doors means loose items will be joining occupants on the seat or sitting on the floor.

The Mazda2 has a claimed 250 litres of luggage space in the boot, which is fine for a small hatchback, but short of rivals like the Toyota Yaris' 270L.


Suzuki Swift

At just over 4.1m long the MG3 is around 250mm longer than the Swift and not surprisingly its wheelbase is 120mm up on the Suzuki.

And there’s more than enough room up front in the MG and storage is good with bins in the doors and space for medium-sized bottles, as well as multiple cup/bottle holders in the centre console with movable dividers to structure the spaces as you see fit.

There’s a box between the front seats with a sliding tray inside it, alongside another partitioned oddments space and there’s a decent glove box.

For power and connectivity you’ve got USB-A and USB-C sockets with a 12-volt socket between them.

Important to note the MG’s steering column only adjusts for height which is a throwback to the 1990s, while the Swift’s adjusts for rake and reach, as you’d expect.

In terms of storage in the front of the Suzuki there are bins in the doors with room for bottles and cup/bottle holders in the centre console with an oddments tray in front of them (this becomes the wireless charging tray in the top-spec GLX).

No centre box/armrest between the front seats, just a low surround for the (manual) handbrake with a single cupholder at the back of it, more for backseaters than those in the front.

Again, there’s a generous glove box and this time around for connectivity there are two USB-A sockets (one for media) and a USB-C with a 12V next to them for power.

The rear of both of these city cars is surprisingly accommodating. Sitting behind the driver’s seat set to my 183cm position I have good foot, leg and headroom in each. Slightly less shoulder room in the Swift, which, after all, is 62mm narrower than the MG3.

Telling that neither car has map pockets on the front seat backs or a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders. But there are door bins in the MG3 with room for bottles while the Suzuki’s back doors have wells in them with just enough size for a mid-size bottle.

Big tick for the MG’s adjustable air vents for those in the back seat, with a small oddments tray and an additional USB-A outlet for power underneath it.

Boot space is surprisingly close with each of these minis able to hold the large and small cases from our three-piece luggage set. The MG3 offers 293 litres of volume with the Swift at 265L.

Worth noting the Suzuki’s rear seat splits and folds 60/40 for extra space and flexibility while the MG’s is a not as flexible single-piece folding backrest.

When it comes to a spare tyre, a repair/inflator kit is your only option for both of these cars, which is less than ideal.

Dimensions 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Length (mm)

4113

3860

Width (mm)

1797

1735

Height (mm)

1502

1520

Wheelbase (mm)

2570

2450

Boot volume (L)

293/983

265/589

USB front

1 x C / 1 x A

1 x C / 2 x A

USB rear

1 x A

⛌

Cupholders front

2

2

Cupholders rear

⛌

1

Bottleholders front

door bins

door bins

Bottleholders rear

door bins

bottle tubes

Adjustable rear A/C vents

✓

⛌

12-volt socket

1 x front

1 x front

Rear map pockets

⛌

⛌

Spare tyre

repair kit

repair kit

Glove box

medium

medium

Front centre box/armrest 

✓

⛌

Rating

8.0

7.0

Price and features

Mazda 2

Mazda has managed to keep pricing for its entry model relatively low for the segment. In fact, the base Pure in manual form starts from $22,410, before on-roads, and the auto is only $2000 more.

That means at a time when the Toyota Yaris is starting to look more expensive than its historic ‘cheap and cheerful' image allows, Mazda is pushing the Mazda2 to be slightly more premium while keeping its price competitive.

Standard features for the range, which start in the Pure variant, include a 7.0-inch touchscreen with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto capability, plus auto headlights and windscreen wipers.

The Pure SP, which starts at $25,210, gains a different styling kit that adds a body-coloured front panel to the grille, plus a carbon-look roof in vinyl. It also gains the ‘shark-fin' roof aerial.

The Evolve, which starts from $25,910, gains LED DRLs, with the mesh grille replacing the SP's block colour panel.

Its upholstery gets red stitching, plus it's also got a couple more tech additions with Mazda's active head-up driver display, traffic sign recognition and satellite navigation.

Finally, there's the top-spec GT, from $27,610, which gains unique aero-inspired 16-inch alloy wheels, and a set of black leather-upholstered seats with synthetic suede and red trim.

A sedan is available in Pure or GT specification at the same prices and with the same features as the hatch, though you can't get a Pure sedan in manual - that's available in the hatch only.


Suzuki Swift

In line with your budget these cars come in under $30K, before on-road costs… one of them, only just.

There are two MG3 Hybrid+ grades, the top-spec Essence and the entry-level Excite we’re testing here that just slips under the price cap at $29,990.

Sitting in the centre of three variants, the Suzuki Swift Hybrid Plus wears a 10 per cent lower price tag than the MG at $26,990 and there are some standard spec differences you should know about.

Both feature 16-inch alloy wheels, six-speaker audio, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity and fabric upholstery, however the MG’s central multimedia screen is bigger and its air-conditioning is auto climate control, where the Swift’s is manual.

But the Suzuki scores a few significant wins like LED headlights compared to the MG’s halogens, heated front seats, digital radio and a leather-trimmed steering wheel. Not to mention keyless entry, built-in nav and wireless Apple CarPlay.

The Swift also includes auto headlights with self-levelling and auto high-beam. Both boast heated exterior mirrors and the MG’s auto fold. But now we’re splitting hairs. Taking its lower cost-of-entry into account the Swift Hybrid Plus comes out in front in terms of price and features.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Price (MSRP)

$29,990

$26,990

Multimedia screen

10.25-inch

9.0-inch

LED headlights

⛌

✓

Android Auto / Apple CarPlay

✓

✓ (wireless Apple)

Heated front seats

⛌

✓

Upholstery

fabric

fabric

Audio

six-speaker

six-speaker

Nav

⛌

✓

Digital radio

⛌

✓

A/C

auto (single zone)

manual

Keyless entry

⛌

✓

Leather trimmed steering wheel

⛌

✓

Auto rain-sensing wipers

⛌

⛌

Alloy wheels

✓

✓

Privacy glass

⛌

✓

Steering column adjust

height

height & reach

Wireless charging

⛌

⛌

Rating

7.0

9.0

Under the bonnet

Mazda 2

Mazda's ‘SkyActiv-G' 1.5 litre four-cylinder petrol engine is the unit used for six-speed manual and automatic models, but outputs vary slightly.

Manual cars produce 82kW and 144Nm, while autos deliver a slightly lower 81kW and 142Nm, both driving the front wheels only.

It's pretty much the same engine you used to find in an entry-grade MX-5, just with less power.


Suzuki Swift

Markedly different stories under the bonnets of these two.

The MG3 is a full petrol-electric hybrid with a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine working in concert with a separate electric motor on the front axle. Combined outputs are a healthy 155kW/425Nm.

While the Swift is mild hybrid powered by a 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine with an enhanced starter/generator/electric motor picking up some of the slack in terms of powering the stop-start system and adding 60Nm of torque for a little extra oomph when required. Output stats are 61kW/112Nm (plus 2.3kW/60Nm).

Both send drive to the front wheels, in the case of the MG through a three-speed ‘hybrid’ transmission managing combustion and electric drive simultaneously while the Suzuki uses a continuously variable auto transmission (CVT). 

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Engine

1.5L 4cyl atmo petrol

1.2L 3cyl atmo petrol

Power (kW)

75 @ 6000rpm

61 @ 5700rpm

Torque (Nm)

128 @ 4500rpm

112Nm @ 4500rpm

Power combined (kW)

155 @ 8000rpm

'ISG' adds 2.3kW/60Nm

Torque combined (Nm)

425      

-

Transmission 

Three-speed ‘Hybrid’ auto

Continuously variable auto

Drive

FWD

FWD

Rating

8.0

7.0

Efficiency

Mazda 2

Improved fuel efficiency and lower CO2 emissions come thanks to the automatic's slight drop in power and torque.

Mazda claims a 5.0L/100 km rating for the automatic Mazda2, which is down by 0.3L/100km over the previous version, but the manual's unchanged engine tune burns through the petrol at 5.4L/100km.

Filling the 44-litre tank with at least 91RON or even E10 is fine, and with its auto variant's efficiency rating means the Mazda2 technically has a theoretical range of 880km.

Comparatively the Mazda2 scores well here, the more expensive Toyota Yaris comes with a 4.8L/100km consumption claim with its CVT auto. A Suzuki Swift, with a smaller 1.2-litre engine, also has a 4.8L/100km rating.


Suzuki Swift

MG claims the MG3 Hybrid consumes just 4.3L of fuel for every 100km travelled on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, which is amazing for a car with its performance potential, but the featherweight Swift does even better at a miserly 4.0L/100km.

On test, over an extended mix of city, suburban and freeway running we saw the MG sip just 3.9L/100km, with the Swift on 3.8. To all intents and purposes a tie.

Worth noting both cars demand 95 RON premium unleaded fuel and based on our real-world results you can expect a range of around 1250km for the MG3 and 1025km for the Swift, the latter carrying a smaller fuel tank. Brilliant fuel efficiency.

L/100km

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Official combined cycle

4.3

4.0

On test (bowser)

3.9

3.8

On test (dash)

4.3

4.3

CO2 (Combined cycle - g/km)

100

90

Fuel tank (L)

45

37

Fuel grade

95 RON premium

95 RON premium

Range - Theoretical (Combined cycle - km)

1046

925

Range - Real world (On test - km)

1250

1027

Hybrid battery 

1.83kWh

12-volt/10Ah

Rating

9

9

Driving

Mazda 2

Our drive loop for the Mazda2's launch included a mix of urban, highway, and rural driving, with varying road quality and conditions.

Fortunately for the little hatchback, it handled everything well or at least at a passing mark, with only a couple of small shortcomings that are common in the segment.

The Mazda2 is a joy to drive in most circumstances, with a lively but confidence-inspiring chassis and controls that give a connected feel to the road.

At low speeds, the Mazda2's relatively low power isn't noticeable, with the gearbox getting things moving at a reasonable pace and the engine is responsive enough with the traditional gearbox helping it along.

It's worth noting that for ultimate control over the drivetrain, Mazda still offers a six-speed manual transmission in the entry-grade Pure, and it's a gem.

Smooth, sporty shifts and well thought out gear ratios mean the manual is easy to handle even in traffic, and the clutch has a forgiving bite point. The 'i-Stop' stop/start system works with the three-pedal car, too, as does cruise control.

In terms of handling and comfort, the Mazda2 is a little shaken by large bumps, though some of the rough surfaces on our test loop were particularly brutal.

Similarly, when pushed hard to conquer steep hills the 1.5-litre engine becomes a little harsh.

On twisty sections the Mazda2 (especially in manual form) provides ample fun while remaining predictable in its steering and chassis feedback, rather than feeling loose.


Suzuki Swift

MG claims the MG3 Hybrid will accelerate from 0-100km/h in 8.0sec and it feels quick, especially in ‘Sport’ mode, rather than the ‘Eco’ and ‘Normal’ settings.

No doubt the MG is the quieter of the two and it’s important to point out the MG3 is able to run on pure electric power, while the Suzuki cannot.

Suspension is by struts at the front and torsion beam at the rear and the MG feels bumpier over typical pock-marked and patched urban surfaces. That may have something to do with the MG3’s 1298kg kerb weight and slightly wider and lower profile tyres - 195/55 vs 185/65.

The MG steers nicely through a squared-off steering wheel, a la the ‘quartic’ wheel found in the Austin Allegro and Rover SD1 from the 1970s. Road feel is good.

Disc brakes front and rear do the stopping on the MG with three levels of regenerative braking available. The most aggressive setting slows the car markedly but won’t bring it to a full stop, so no ‘single pedal’ driving.

By comparison, expect the Swift to reach 100km/h in around 12.5sec and first impressions are dominated by the characteristically coarse three-cylinder engine and exhaust sound.

Flick the Sport button on the gear shift and performance becomes more urgent but it can’t match the MG’s punch. That said, you can feel that extra 60Nm of pulling power when you want it.

But it’s the Suzuki’s supple ride and nimble handling that stand it apart. Despite its shorter wheelbase and substantially lighter weight the little Suzuki irons out bumps and thumps beautifully.

The steering is well-weighted, accurate and responsive with excellent road feel. Braking is by disc at the front and, yes, drums the size of a small Tupperware container at the rear.

But jokes aside, in a car this light a good drum brake will work perfectly well and it does here. No levels of regen braking. As soon as you’re off the throttle a small light on the dash lets you know you’re sending energy to the battery.

In terms of miscellaneous observations, the MG’s front seats aren’t as comfy as the Suzuki’s. In fact, all who drove the MG3 noticed the driver’s seat cushion is overly firm towards the rear, pushing into your tailbone.

The driver’s door armrests are hard in both cars and there’s some mild wind noise in the Swift at freeway speeds.

Both are super-easy to park but the Swift is that bit smaller with superior visibility, and neither car has a rotary dial for audio volume with wheel, dash buttons or screen sliders instead.

Overall both of these light hatches offer excellent dynamics and refinement for the money, but the Swift delivers a more relaxed and engaging drive.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

0-100km/h (sec)

8.0

12.5

Suspension

strut / torsion beam

strut / torsion beam

Steering

rack & pinion

rack & pinion

Wheels

16-inch alloy

16-inch alloy

Tyres

195/55

185/65

Spare

repair kit

repair kit

Brakes

vented disc / disc

vented disc / drum

Kerb weight (kg)

1298

957

Rating

7.0

9.0

Safety

Mazda 2

The updated Mazda2 is equipped with the brand's suite of 'i-Activsense' safety tech, which includes 'Smart City Brake Support' for operating forward and reverse, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert.

The Evolve and GT model grades are fitted with traffic sign recognition.

The GT model grade comes fitted with front parking sensors and a set of surround-view parking cameras.

The Mazda2 also features six SRS airbags to cover the driver and front passenger, side airbags, and curtain airbags front and rear. It also has ISOFIX anchor points and top tethers for child seats in the rear.

Mazda isn't going to put the Mazda2 up for a new crash test rating by ANCAP, with the brand telling us the new safety additions bring the car's safety up to date, though its original rating from 2015 was a maximum five stars.


Suzuki Swift

Neither of these cars carries a current safety assessment from ANCAP but both do well in terms of active (crash-avoidance) technology.

Big ticket items like auto emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping assist and rear cross-traffic alert are present and accounted for, which is impressive in the under-$30K part of the market.

Both also feature adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and rear parking sensors. But the MG adds lane change assist.

And if a crash is unavoidable it’s a tie on airbags at six each, with neither featuring the increasingly common front centre bag to minimise head clash injuries in a side impact.

Both have three top tethers and two ISOFIX anchors for child seats across the second row, although squeezing three seats into these small cars would be a feat worthy of Harry Houdini himself.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

AEB

✓

✓

Adaptive cruise control

✓

✓

Lane departure warning

✓

✓

Lane keeping assist

✓

✓

Lane departure prevention

✓

✓

Lane change assist

✓

⛌

Blind-spot monitoring

✓

✓

Traffic sign recognition

✓

✓

Pedestrian and cyclist detection

✓

✓

Rear cross-traffic alert

✓

✓

Reversing camera

✓

✓

Parking sensors

Rear

Rear

Tyre pressure monitoring

✓

✓

Driver monitoring

✓

✓

ANCAP

Unrated

Not tested

Front airbags

✓

✓

Front side airbags

✓

✓

Curtain airbags

✓

✓

Child seat top tethers

Three

Three

ISOFIX anchors

Two

Two

Rating

8.0

8.0

Ownership

Mazda 2

Mazda offers a five-year/unlimited-kilometre warranty across the range, under which the Mazda2 will be covered. That's on par for the market, although some rivals, like the MG3, come with a seven-year term.

Scheduled servicing costs for the first seven workshop visits range from $334 to $587, and are undertaken every 12 months or 15,000km (whichever comes first).


Suzuki Swift

MG has just made an aggressive move in extending its warranty up to 10 years/250,000km which puts it ahead of Suzuki’s five-year/unlimited km cover, unless you’re a high-mileage driver.

Roadside assist is provided for five years if you have these cars serviced through their respective authorised networks and both offer fixed-price servicing.

Service intervals are 12 months or 10,000km for the MG3, or 12 months/15,000km for the Swift and costs are line ball… at an annual average of around $400 per workshop visit for each.

We’re giving it to the MG3 by a nose.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Warranty

10-year/250,000km

Five-year/unlimited km

Service interval

12 months / 10,000km

12 months / 15,000km

Roadside Assist

Five years (conditional)

Five years (conditional)

Fixed price servicing

Yes

Yes

Annual average

$409

$391
($435 if +100K km at five years)

Rating

8.0

8.0