The Toyota Landcruiser Prado 2007 prices range from $7,250 for the basic trim level SUV Landcruiser Prado GXL (4X4) to $28,990 for the top of the range SUV Landcruiser Prado VX (4X4).
The Toyota Landcruiser Prado 2007 is available in Diesel and Regular Unleaded Petrol. Engine sizes and transmissions vary from the SUV 4.0L 5 SP Automatic to the SUV 3.0L 5 SP Automatic.
SUV
Toyota Landcruiser Prado Models | SPECS | PRICE |
---|---|---|
Grande (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $25,080 – 31,020 |
Grande (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $20,900 – 26,400 |
GX (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $18,370 – 23,320 |
GX (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $17,490 – 22,110 |
GX (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $10,890 – 14,850 |
GX (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $10,230 – 13,970 |
GX Limited | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $14,190 – 18,700 |
GX Limited | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP MAN5 speed manual | $14,960 – 19,690 |
GX Limited | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $8,800 – 12,320 |
GX Limited | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $8,250 – 11,550 |
GXL (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $21,120 – 26,730 |
GXL (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $20,020 – 25,410 |
GXL (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $18,150 – 22,990 |
GXL (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $19,250 – 24,420 |
Standard (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $10,670 – 14,630 |
Standard (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel6 SP MAN6 speed manual | $16,170 – 20,790 |
VX (4X4) | 3.0LDieselDiesel5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $22,770 – 28,160 |
VX (4X4) | 4.0LULPRegular Unleaded Petrol5 SP AUTO5 speed automatic | $15,730 – 20,130 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2007 FAQs
Check out real-world situations relating to the Toyota Land Cruiser Prado 2007 here, particularly what our experts have to say about them.
-
Prado engine failure
You could make a claim for the cost of the 120,000 km service to be refunded, because it wasn’t done correctly, but you don't have much of a case for the engine repair. As the previous owner serviced the car and not Toyota, and the seals weren’t changed, Toyota has a perfect out.
Show more -
Black smoke on 2007 Toyota Prado
It's not an uncommon problem. It starts with a leakage past the fuel injector seals and ends with the oil pick-up in the sump blocked by a carbon build-up. Eventually the engine loses oil pressure and the engine is destroyed. Toyota recalled and fixed affected vehicles in other countries, but chose not to do anything here. You could try approaching the company to get some compensation for the cost of replacing the engine, Toyota has done it for others who have pressed their case. If that fails you could consult your state consumer affairs people.
Show more -
Toyota Prado: Oil sludge
The oil sludging is believed to be caused by fuel leakage past the fuel-injector seals into the oil stream. Eventually it can lead to the oil pickup being blocked, which then starves the engine of oil. It's a known problem in other parts of the world, but Toyota has not done anything about it here, even though we know of a number of cars that have suffered severe engine meltdowns. To make it worse the oil seals in question are supposed to be replaced at the 40,000km service when the valve clearances are checked and reset. It's clear that this isn't always done. Like you, I would be very angry about having the engine fail at such low kays, and I would be letting Toyota head office know about it in no uncertain terms. I know of one owner who managed to get them to replace the engine in his car when it had done over 200,000km, so I would urge you not to take Toyota's "no" for an answer and push them to the limit. Take action through Consumer Affairs if needed. Don't worry that the Toyota warranty has expired, the company still has an obligation to sell you a product that is fit for purpose, and it would seem in this case that it has not.
Show more