Browse over 9,000 car reviews

Toyota Prius C


Suzuki Swift

Summary

Toyota Prius C

See if you can guess the name of the world's first ride-sharing app. You're thinking Uber, right? Nope. It was a company called Sidecar. It's broke now, shuttered for good in 2015. What about the first video-on-demand service? Netflix? Nope. Amazon beat them to it, for starters, but so did many other, now-defunct companies who tried it even earlier.

The point is, being first on the scene is no guarantee you'll be the best, or the most successful. I mean, just look at electric cars; plenty of manufacturers were doing all-battery models before (and arguably better than) Tesla, and every one of them is now parked in Elon Musk's gargantuan shadow.

Before full-electric there were hybrids, and first to arrive on that particular scene in any meaningful way was Toyota and its awkwardly shaped Prius, back in 2001. And they had that field to themselves for a while, but soon enough the other manufacturers trotted out hybrid and plug-in hybrid models of their own.

And so Toyota shook up the Prius offering, launching the seven-seat Prius V, and the bite-sized (and Yaris-based) Prius c we've tested here, in 2012, hoping to broaden the appeal of its hybrid offerings. Problem is, 2012 was an awfully long time ago, and so Toyota has waved its wand over the ageing Prius c for 2018, changing its design, tech offering and interior in an effort to keep it fresh.

So, is the Japanese giant still head of the hybrid class? Or has it been beaten at its own game?

Safety rating
Engine Type1.5L
Fuel TypeHybrid with Regular Unleaded
Fuel Efficiency3.9L/100km
Seating5 seats

Suzuki Swift

You’ve set a new-car budget ceiling of $30,000. Your preference is for a small five-door hatch rather than the ubiquitous ‘compact SUV’ and with fuel price surges now a painfully regular part of life you like the idea of a hybrid. 

Well, here are two well-credentialed, just-released contenders fitting that description ready to vie for your attention.

MG’s all-new MG3 replaces a model that’s dominated the light car segment in recent years and brings a new hybrid variant to the party. And Suzuki's Swift is an Aussie small car favourite with this recently launched sixth-generation version adding a mild-hybrid to the range.

We’ll get into how these city-sized newcomers shape up in terms of performance, economy, safety, practicality, value and more. So, stay with us to see which one has the best chance of filling that small car-sized space on your driveway.

Safety rating
Engine Type1.5L
Fuel TypeHybrid with Premium Unleaded
Fuel Efficiency4.3L/100km
Seating5 seats

Verdict

Toyota Prius C6.6/10

It's as if the the future is firmly rooted in the past at Toyota. The Prius is still undoubtedly clever, frugal and easy to drive, but it is feeling so old in places that the bad had begun to weigh on the good. If you're a tech-head or have a right foot crafted from lead, then there's nothing to see here. But if the thought of saving money at the bowser sets your heart aflutter, then step right this way.

Does a Prius c make you feel green, or just queasy? Let us know in the comments below.


Suzuki Swift/10

This is close, with things like safety and these cars’ amazing fuel efficiency too close to call. 

In terms of performance, practicality and the ownership package, the MG has the edge. But not by much, and when it comes to driving comfort and dynamics and critically, value for money, the Suzuki takes the lead.

Your particular priorities may drive a different decision, but in this head-to-head our nod goes to the Swift Hybrid Plus.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Rating

7.9

8.0

Design

Toyota Prius C

The good news is that it doesn't look quite so quirky as the full-size Prius. The not-as-good news is that it's still no beauty-contest winner. Not helping matters was the fact our test vehicle was painted in a retina-burning yellow (they call it Hornet Yellow, and it's new for 2018) that looked almost nuclear.

Viewed front on, the blacked-out section of grille and bumper gives the littlest Prius a vaguely manta ray-shaped front-end, while the headlights climb both upwards and back into the body, lending a sense of sportiness to this very unsporty hybrid. From the back, the chunky bumper, vertical taillights and rear windscreen spoiler all add a little attitude to the design.

Inside, you'll find a small but premium-in-places space, with a gloss-black stereo surround that angles the main controls toward the driver, while the digital driver's binnacle is pushed toward the centre of the car, displaying speed, fuel and other key info above the stereo, rather than in front of the steering wheel.


Suzuki Swift

In terms of exterior design the MG is a mix of hard character lines and sharp angles, for example in the headlights and tail-lights as well as vents front and rear.

Suzuki follows an evolutionary approach when it comes to the Swift’s design. Cover this latest version’s badges and thanks to its chunky proportions and upright stance, any half-decent car-spotter will still pick it.

A relatively high waistline gives the Swift a solid look while our test car’s two-tone premium ‘Frontier Blue Pearl’ paint (an $1145 option) with black turret enhances the signature ‘floating roof’ effect.

The MG3’s interior is clean and simple with the tone set by a twin-screen setup; a 10.25-inch multimedia display in the centre and a 7.0-inch instrument cluster in front of the driver.

But it’s dark, from the roof lining, to the dash, to the seats. And in this part of the market you can forget about soft-touch cabin materials, the plastics are hard save for some padding across the centre level of the dash.

By comparison the Swift’s interior is conventional with a relatively small media screen artificially enlarged by a broad gloss plastic frame. Analogue instruments, albeit with a multi-function digital screen in the centre (including a digital speedometer) look dated by comparison and the layered dash treatment appears fussy next to the MG’s layout.

Some grey and cream elements lighten the tone but, again, it’s a world of hard plastic surfaces inside the Suzuki.

Always a subjective call. We’re giving the design gong to the MG for its more contemporary approach, but I like the Swift, too, analogue instruments and all.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Rating

8.0

7.0

Practicality

Toyota Prius C

Not very. This is a Yaris-based city car, let's not forget.

That said, it never feels cramped up front, with enough shoulder and headroom to ensure you feel separated from your fellow passengers, where you'll also find two cupholders, and an infuriating USB connection housed in the touchscreen - so your cord dangles from the dash when connected.

Climb into the back, and you'll find yourself in a pretty snug space. Sitting behind my own (5ft-8inch) driving position, it's only the scalloped back of the driver's seat that affords me any clear air between my knees and the seat in front, and the space behind my head and the roof lining is minuscule, too. But again, we're talking city car space here, so you can't expect to lounge about back there.

The ambience in the backseat leaves a little to be desired, though. The door trim pushes into the passenger space, and the plastics used in the rear are rock hard. There's a single cupholder to share, and a seat-back pocket on the rear of the passenger seat, but that's it; there's no vents, USB or power sources. There's no bottle-room in the rear doors, either.

An easy-access boot space will swallow 260 litres with the 60:40 rear seats in place. And there are two ISOFIX attachment points, one in each window seat in the back.


Suzuki Swift

At just over 4.1m long the MG3 is around 250mm longer than the Swift and not surprisingly its wheelbase is 120mm up on the Suzuki.

And there’s more than enough room up front in the MG and storage is good with bins in the doors and space for medium-sized bottles, as well as multiple cup/bottle holders in the centre console with movable dividers to structure the spaces as you see fit.

There’s a box between the front seats with a sliding tray inside it, alongside another partitioned oddments space and there’s a decent glove box.

For power and connectivity you’ve got USB-A and USB-C sockets with a 12-volt socket between them.

Important to note the MG’s steering column only adjusts for height which is a throwback to the 1990s, while the Swift’s adjusts for rake and reach, as you’d expect.

In terms of storage in the front of the Suzuki there are bins in the doors with room for bottles and cup/bottle holders in the centre console with an oddments tray in front of them (this becomes the wireless charging tray in the top-spec GLX).

No centre box/armrest between the front seats, just a low surround for the (manual) handbrake with a single cupholder at the back of it, more for backseaters than those in the front.

Again, there’s a generous glove box and this time around for connectivity there are two USB-A sockets (one for media) and a USB-C with a 12V next to them for power.

The rear of both of these city cars is surprisingly accommodating. Sitting behind the driver’s seat set to my 183cm position I have good foot, leg and headroom in each. Slightly less shoulder room in the Swift, which, after all, is 62mm narrower than the MG3.

Telling that neither car has map pockets on the front seat backs or a fold-down centre armrest with cupholders. But there are door bins in the MG3 with room for bottles while the Suzuki’s back doors have wells in them with just enough size for a mid-size bottle.

Big tick for the MG’s adjustable air vents for those in the back seat, with a small oddments tray and an additional USB-A outlet for power underneath it.

Boot space is surprisingly close with each of these minis able to hold the large and small cases from our three-piece luggage set. The MG3 offers 293 litres of volume with the Swift at 265L.

Worth noting the Suzuki’s rear seat splits and folds 60/40 for extra space and flexibility while the MG’s is a not as flexible single-piece folding backrest.

When it comes to a spare tyre, a repair/inflator kit is your only option for both of these cars, which is less than ideal.

Dimensions 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Length (mm)

4113

3860

Width (mm)

1797

1735

Height (mm)

1502

1520

Wheelbase (mm)

2570

2450

Boot volume (L)

293/983

265/589

USB front

1 x C / 1 x A

1 x C / 2 x A

USB rear

1 x A

⛌

Cupholders front

2

2

Cupholders rear

⛌

1

Bottleholders front

door bins

door bins

Bottleholders rear

door bins

bottle tubes

Adjustable rear A/C vents

✓

⛌

12-volt socket

1 x front

1 x front

Rear map pockets

⛌

⛌

Spare tyre

repair kit

repair kit

Glove box

medium

medium

Front centre box/armrest 

✓

⛌

Rating

8.0

7.0

Price and features

Toyota Prius C

We've just spent a week behind the wheel of the Prius c i-Tech; the top model in the two-variant range, sitting above a cheaper model known simply as the Prius c.

At $26,540, it ain't cheap for a city car (and it's $4k more than the most-expensive Yaris on which it is based; more worryingly, it's only $1500 cheaper than an Audi A1), and the standard features list is more a novella than War and Peace.

Outside, you'll find 15-inch alloy wheels, remote unlocking, LED headlights and front fog lamps, while inside you'll leather-look seats (they're actually vinyl), sat-nav and climate-control.

Tech is covered by an  (old-school feeling) 6.1-inch touchscreen that pairs with a six-speaker stereo, but there's no Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.


Suzuki Swift

In line with your budget these cars come in under $30K, before on-road costs… one of them, only just.

There are two MG3 Hybrid+ grades, the top-spec Essence and the entry-level Excite we’re testing here that just slips under the price cap at $29,990.

Sitting in the centre of three variants, the Suzuki Swift Hybrid Plus wears a 10 per cent lower price tag than the MG at $26,990 and there are some standard spec differences you should know about.

Both feature 16-inch alloy wheels, six-speaker audio, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity and fabric upholstery, however the MG’s central multimedia screen is bigger and its air-conditioning is auto climate control, where the Swift’s is manual.

But the Suzuki scores a few significant wins like LED headlights compared to the MG’s halogens, heated front seats, digital radio and a leather-trimmed steering wheel. Not to mention keyless entry, built-in nav and wireless Apple CarPlay.

The Swift also includes auto headlights with self-levelling and auto high-beam. Both boast heated exterior mirrors and the MG’s auto fold. But now we’re splitting hairs. Taking its lower cost-of-entry into account the Swift Hybrid Plus comes out in front in terms of price and features.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Price (MSRP)

$29,990

$26,990

Multimedia screen

10.25-inch

9.0-inch

LED headlights

⛌

✓

Android Auto / Apple CarPlay

✓

✓ (wireless Apple)

Heated front seats

⛌

✓

Upholstery

fabric

fabric

Audio

six-speaker

six-speaker

Nav

⛌

✓

Digital radio

⛌

✓

A/C

auto (single zone)

manual

Keyless entry

⛌

✓

Leather trimmed steering wheel

⛌

✓

Auto rain-sensing wipers

⛌

⛌

Alloy wheels

✓

✓

Privacy glass

⛌

✓

Steering column adjust

height

height & reach

Wireless charging

⛌

⛌

Rating

7.0

9.0

Under the bonnet

Toyota Prius C

Under that little hood lives a 1.5-litre, four-cylinder petrol engine good for 54kW, which pairs with a 45kW electric motor. Toyota lists combined outputs at 74kW at 4800rpm and 111Nm at 4000rpm.

That hybrid setup partners with a CVT automatic, pumping power to the front wheels.


Suzuki Swift

Markedly different stories under the bonnets of these two.

The MG3 is a full petrol-electric hybrid with a 1.5-litre four-cylinder petrol engine working in concert with a separate electric motor on the front axle. Combined outputs are a healthy 155kW/425Nm.

While the Swift is mild hybrid powered by a 1.2-litre three-cylinder engine with an enhanced starter/generator/electric motor picking up some of the slack in terms of powering the stop-start system and adding 60Nm of torque for a little extra oomph when required. Output stats are 61kW/112Nm (plus 2.3kW/60Nm).

Both send drive to the front wheels, in the case of the MG through a three-speed ‘hybrid’ transmission managing combustion and electric drive simultaneously while the Suzuki uses a continuously variable auto transmission (CVT). 

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Engine

1.5L 4cyl atmo petrol

1.2L 3cyl atmo petrol

Power (kW)

75 @ 6000rpm

61 @ 5700rpm

Torque (Nm)

128 @ 4500rpm

112Nm @ 4500rpm

Power combined (kW)

155 @ 8000rpm

'ISG' adds 2.3kW/60Nm

Torque combined (Nm)

425      

-

Transmission 

Three-speed ‘Hybrid’ auto

Continuously variable auto

Drive

FWD

FWD

Rating

8.0

7.0

Efficiency

Toyota Prius C

If that last section didn't impress, this one surely will. The little Prius c will sip a claimed 3.9L/100km on the combined cycle.

That's very low, and the fact it accepts cheaper 91RON fuel makes it a very affordable car to run. Except... the onboard computers revealed a slightly less-impressive 5.1L/100km after my time with the car.

Emissions are a claimed 90g/km of CO2, which is very good.


Suzuki Swift

MG claims the MG3 Hybrid consumes just 4.3L of fuel for every 100km travelled on the combined (urban/extra-urban) cycle, which is amazing for a car with its performance potential, but the featherweight Swift does even better at a miserly 4.0L/100km.

On test, over an extended mix of city, suburban and freeway running we saw the MG sip just 3.9L/100km, with the Swift on 3.8. To all intents and purposes a tie.

Worth noting both cars demand 95 RON premium unleaded fuel and based on our real-world results you can expect a range of around 1250km for the MG3 and 1025km for the Swift, the latter carrying a smaller fuel tank. Brilliant fuel efficiency.

L/100km

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Official combined cycle

4.3

4.0

On test (bowser)

3.9

3.8

On test (dash)

4.3

4.3

CO2 (Combined cycle - g/km)

100

90

Fuel tank (L)

45

37

Fuel grade

95 RON premium

95 RON premium

Range - Theoretical (Combined cycle - km)

1046

925

Range - Real world (On test - km)

1250

1027

Hybrid battery 

1.83kWh

12-volt/10Ah

Rating

9

9

Driving

Toyota Prius C

In much the same way that you don't buy an exotic performance car for its ability to run to the shops, you're unlikely to be buying the Prius for its ability to set your pulse racing.

But happily, it doesn't feel wobbly or disconnected, either. It's aided by being such a small package, and when you're not wafting silently about in electric mode, and you've coaxed that little petrol engine into life, it serves up more than enough poke to navigate the city, and even to leave the slow-reactors in your rear-view mirror at traffic lights.

The ride is good, too, feeling connected to the road below without feeling uncomfortable, although the little Prius does tend to track with the corrugations in the road, leaving you to wrestle it back into line. That's a job made easier by light and surprisingly direct steering, which feels tailor-made for the city.

Finally, the leather-look seats are comfortable, even over long distances, the razor-thin A-pillars make forward vision easy and it's a very simple thing to drive and manoeuvre  into parking spaces. And all of those are good things.

Not so good? Well, the entire drive experiences feels a little beige and emotionless, it can get noisy and there are parts of the cabin that feel downright cheap. Worst of all, though, is that for a car that once heralded the future, it's feeling very, very dated.

But there are some amazing quirks attached to driving an (almost) electric car, including the delivery of eco awards for using the least amount of fuel (they were awarded for 2.6, 3.2 and 3.6L/100km over as much as 25km - none of which occurred during my tenure). The hardest thing to get used to was the absolute silence served up in electric mode. I counted four seperate occasions when I walked away from the car with it still turned on.


Suzuki Swift

MG claims the MG3 Hybrid will accelerate from 0-100km/h in 8.0sec and it feels quick, especially in ‘Sport’ mode, rather than the ‘Eco’ and ‘Normal’ settings.

No doubt the MG is the quieter of the two and it’s important to point out the MG3 is able to run on pure electric power, while the Suzuki cannot.

Suspension is by struts at the front and torsion beam at the rear and the MG feels bumpier over typical pock-marked and patched urban surfaces. That may have something to do with the MG3’s 1298kg kerb weight and slightly wider and lower profile tyres - 195/55 vs 185/65.

The MG steers nicely through a squared-off steering wheel, a la the ‘quartic’ wheel found in the Austin Allegro and Rover SD1 from the 1970s. Road feel is good.

Disc brakes front and rear do the stopping on the MG with three levels of regenerative braking available. The most aggressive setting slows the car markedly but won’t bring it to a full stop, so no ‘single pedal’ driving.

By comparison, expect the Swift to reach 100km/h in around 12.5sec and first impressions are dominated by the characteristically coarse three-cylinder engine and exhaust sound.

Flick the Sport button on the gear shift and performance becomes more urgent but it can’t match the MG’s punch. That said, you can feel that extra 60Nm of pulling power when you want it.

But it’s the Suzuki’s supple ride and nimble handling that stand it apart. Despite its shorter wheelbase and substantially lighter weight the little Suzuki irons out bumps and thumps beautifully.

The steering is well-weighted, accurate and responsive with excellent road feel. Braking is by disc at the front and, yes, drums the size of a small Tupperware container at the rear.

But jokes aside, in a car this light a good drum brake will work perfectly well and it does here. No levels of regen braking. As soon as you’re off the throttle a small light on the dash lets you know you’re sending energy to the battery.

In terms of miscellaneous observations, the MG’s front seats aren’t as comfy as the Suzuki’s. In fact, all who drove the MG3 noticed the driver’s seat cushion is overly firm towards the rear, pushing into your tailbone.

The driver’s door armrests are hard in both cars and there’s some mild wind noise in the Swift at freeway speeds.

Both are super-easy to park but the Swift is that bit smaller with superior visibility, and neither car has a rotary dial for audio volume with wheel, dash buttons or screen sliders instead.

Overall both of these light hatches offer excellent dynamics and refinement for the money, but the Swift delivers a more relaxed and engaging drive.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

0-100km/h (sec)

8.0

12.5

Suspension

strut / torsion beam

strut / torsion beam

Steering

rack & pinion

rack & pinion

Wheels

16-inch alloy

16-inch alloy

Tyres

195/55

185/65

Spare

repair kit

repair kit

Brakes

vented disc / disc

vented disc / drum

Kerb weight (kg)

1298

957

Rating

7.0

9.0

Safety

Toyota Prius C

Every Prius c arrives with seven airbags, along with a reversing camera and... wait, that can't be it, can it? Oh... Forget AEB, lane-departure warning and the like, this future-focused Prius has a safety package firmly rooted in the past.

It was awarded the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating, but was tested back in 2014.


Suzuki Swift

Neither of these cars carries a current safety assessment from ANCAP but both do well in terms of active (crash-avoidance) technology.

Big ticket items like auto emergency braking (AEB), blind-spot monitoring, lane keeping assist and rear cross-traffic alert are present and accounted for, which is impressive in the under-$30K part of the market.

Both also feature adaptive cruise control, lane departure warning and rear parking sensors. But the MG adds lane change assist.

And if a crash is unavoidable it’s a tie on airbags at six each, with neither featuring the increasingly common front centre bag to minimise head clash injuries in a side impact.

Both have three top tethers and two ISOFIX anchors for child seats across the second row, although squeezing three seats into these small cars would be a feat worthy of Harry Houdini himself.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

AEB

✓

✓

Adaptive cruise control

✓

✓

Lane departure warning

✓

✓

Lane keeping assist

✓

✓

Lane departure prevention

✓

✓

Lane change assist

✓

⛌

Blind-spot monitoring

✓

✓

Traffic sign recognition

✓

✓

Pedestrian and cyclist detection

✓

✓

Rear cross-traffic alert

✓

✓

Reversing camera

✓

✓

Parking sensors

Rear

Rear

Tyre pressure monitoring

✓

✓

Driver monitoring

✓

✓

ANCAP

Unrated

Not tested

Front airbags

✓

✓

Front side airbags

✓

✓

Curtain airbags

✓

✓

Child seat top tethers

Three

Three

ISOFIX anchors

Two

Two

Rating

8.0

8.0

Ownership

Toyota Prius C

Toyota offers a three-year/100,000km warranty, while the batteries are covered for eight years or 160,000km. The car's six-month service intervals might sting a little, though, but with each service capped at $140 for the first three years, even taking two trips to the dealership a year isn't too expensive. Just annoying.


Suzuki Swift

MG has just made an aggressive move in extending its warranty up to 10 years/250,000km which puts it ahead of Suzuki’s five-year/unlimited km cover, unless you’re a high-mileage driver.

Roadside assist is provided for five years if you have these cars serviced through their respective authorised networks and both offer fixed-price servicing.

Service intervals are 12 months or 10,000km for the MG3, or 12 months/15,000km for the Swift and costs are line ball… at an annual average of around $400 per workshop visit for each.

We’re giving it to the MG3 by a nose.

 

MG MG3

Suzuki Swift

Warranty

10-year/250,000km

Five-year/unlimited km

Service interval

12 months / 10,000km

12 months / 15,000km

Roadside Assist

Five years (conditional)

Five years (conditional)

Fixed price servicing

Yes

Yes

Annual average

$409

$391
($435 if +100K km at five years)

Rating

8.0

8.0