Foton Tunland VS Mazda BT-50
Foton Tunland
Likes
Dislikes
Mazda BT-50
Likes
- Civilised road manners for a ute
- Comfortable, practical cabin
- More engine than is needed
Dislikes
- Price
- Multimedia tech is dated
- Electric tonneau steals some load space
Summary
Foton Tunland
Beiqi Foton Motor Company Ltd (rolls off the tongue, doesn't it?), established in 1996, is one of China’s leading manufacturers of heavy-duty commercial vehicles. It also produces a light commercial range including the Tunland ute, which has ridden a rocky road in Australia with minimal sales traction since its local launch in 2012.
Back then distribution was handled by Queensland-based FAA Automotive Australia. In 2014, Ateco Automotive took over, but that only lasted until mid-2017, when Foton itself took charge of all Australian distribution and sales under the Foton Motor Australia Ltd banner.
A key factor in this move was a rationalisation of the local Tunland fleet, which now consists of only a dual cab ute. But through Foton’s numerous joint ventures with premium OEM suppliers (including Cummins, Borg Warner, Dana, Bosch and ZF), the latest Euro 5-compliant Tunland combines known brand components in a low-priced ute with which Foton plans to finally build a solid following.
Safety rating | |
---|---|
Engine Type | 2.8L turbo |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | 8.3L/100km |
Seating | 2 seats |
Mazda BT-50
This is one of the most expensive utes in its class. It’s more expensive than a Ford Ranger Platinum, a top-spec VW Amarok Adventura or even a V8-powered LandCruiser 70 Series - when you could still get one.
The reason? Mazda has ticked just about every box on this BT-50 Thunder, thanks to the addition of the 'Pro Pack'.
It’s designed to be plush on the inside while being capable and lifestyle-compatible when you’re outside. But does it do the job. or are there better options for what you need?
Read more about
- 'It's never mattered': Mazda not fazed about possibility of losing number two spot to Ford and maybe Kia, as 2024 Mazda CX-5 outsells Nissan X-Trail, Hyundai Tucson and Subaru Forester
- Mazda's confusing SUV plan explained: How the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and CX-80 will fit into the line-up alongside the CX-60 and CX-80, but which family hybrid SUV will be the biggest seller?
- RX-7 re-birth! Mazda Iconic SP headed for production green light, complete with 'pop-up' headlights and twin-rotor rotary EV power to take on Toyota Supra, Nissan Z
A week of driving this specced-up ute through some of Australia’s varying environments has helped us judge.
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | 3.0L turbo |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | 8L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Verdict
Foton Tunland 7.4/10
The 2018 Tunland is a big improvement on any Chinese ute we’ve driven. Foton has done a commendable job in selecting known brand components and bringing them together into one cohesive package that delivers robust performance. Although it doesn’t quite equal the sum of its parts (mostly owing to poor safety features and some technical quirks), it’s still a lot of 4x4 dual cab ute for not a lot of money, and it's worthy of a test drive.
Does the Foton Tunland challenge negative perceptions of Chinese utes? Tell us what you think in the comments below.
Mazda BT-507.9/10
The BT-50 Thunder Pro is hard to fault as an option for a specced-up, comfortable dual-cab… aside from its price.
The benefits that come with the Pro Pack - its beefed-up suspension, snorkel and spotlights - are the sort of thing you’d expect a slightly more rugged off-roader to feature rather than a leather-upholstered ute with an electric tray cover.
While the suspension contributes to its smoothness on-road, there’s no question a much cheaper version of the BT-50 with the same OME BP-51 suspension upgrade (less than $7000 on Mazda’s accessories list by itself) would suit many buyers better.
After all, you’d hate to get mud all over that leather.
Design
Foton Tunland
This is a big ute with an imposing presence, much like the Ford Ranger with which it shares similar dimensions (if not looks). Compared to the Ranger Wildtrak, the Tunland is 115mm shorter in wheelbase and 45mm shorter in overall length, but 20mm wider and 22mm taller. Ground clearance of 210mm is 27mm less and its kerb weight undercuts the Wildtrak by 250kg.
The Tunland uses traditional body-on-frame construction with a steel ladder-frame chassis, coil-spring twin-wishbone front suspension, leaf-spring live rear axle, four-wheel ventilated disc brakes and hydraulic power-assisted rack and pinion steering.Â
Chrome body highlights include the grille, driving lights, side mirrors, door handle inserts and body badges. The dashboard and interior trim feature strongly textured grey surfaces with a tasteful mix of piano black, chrome, satin chrome and carbon fibre-look highlights.Â
There’s good comfort for driver and front passenger, with a height-adjustable steering wheel and multi-adjustable driver’s seat with adequate under-thigh support that doesn’t feel too short like a Triton. The driving position is a big improvement on other Chinese utes we’ve tested, and is on par with many of the major players. The rear bench seat’s low cushion height results in raised upper thigh angles and knees, but also aids in providing unusually generous headroom, even for tall adults sitting in the higher centre position.Â
Mazda BT-50
As it’s not quite on the podium of popular utes in Australia, the BT-50’s advantage is that it stands out a little more in ute-heavy traffic or on rural roads, especially in our test car's 'Red Volcano Mica' paint.
The BT-50 isn’t properly new, its design has become relatively familiar over the years, but it still boasts a modern look in the relatively slow-moving dual-cab ute world, especially compared to the likes of the Toyota HiLux.
Mazda’s well-liked SUV design DNA is on show here, but it blends in well with the ute’s overall shape, and the Thunder elements (perhaps aside from the ‘Thunder Pro’ decals) drew compliments in the city and outta town.
Inside, it’s a little easier to see the Isuzu D-Max twin’s influence, but the Thunder’s brown leather makes up for some otherwise unremarkable interior elements.Â
For a ute, it’s quite nice inside, though not quite up to high-spec Ford Ranger or VW Amarok standards. The multimedia screen looks a bit dated and feels it in use.
Price and features
Foton Tunland
The Foton Tunland is made in two model grades – the H-series (High End) and S-series (Super Value). The S-series (which is not sold here) is a low-cost, steel-wheeled version with components sourced from Chinese suppliers. The H-series is the premium model sold in Australia, so don’t let the red S badge on the tailgate confuse you as it did us at first. The S badge stands for Sport (not Super Value) and is only affixed to H-series vehicles.
The Tunland range comprises 4x2 manual ($26,990), 4x4 manual ($29,990), 4x4 auto ($33,990) and, thanks to its leather seats, 4x4 auto Luxury ($35,490). The 4x4 manual Luxury has recently had a big price reduction from $30,990 to $27,990, reflecting Australia’s growing preference for automatic transmissions.
Our test vehicle is the 4x4 auto, which for a snip under $34,000, brings numerous useful and desirable features including 17-inch alloys and beefy 265/65R17 road-biased tyres with matching spare, power/heated door mirrors, daytime running lights, side steps, auto headlights, rear-view camera and rear parking sensors, leather-trimmed steering wheel with audio/cruise control buttons, power windows, four-speaker sound system with multiple connectivity, eight-way (manual) adjustable driver’s seat and more. Plus there’s an extensive range of accessories.
Mazda BT-50
At $83,141, before on-road costs, the BT-50 Thunder Pro is $9046 more expensive than the standard Thunder on which it builds.
The Thunder being the otherwise top-spec model, starting at $74,095, before on-roads, is still itself up there with the likes of the Ford Ranger Wildtrak ($74,840) and Toyota HiLux GR Sport ($74,310), both toughened-up rivals in terms of their styling.
The Thunder already comes with a decent list of features, arguably more than most dual-cab buyers are looking for, so it would be an understatement to call the Thunder Pro ‘well-equipped’.
The Thunder’s list of standard equipment includes electrically adjustable driver’s seat, heated seats in leather up front, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, a 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen, eight-speaker sound system and both 12-volt and USB-A plugs for devices. You’ll need the latter for Android Auto phone mirroring, because only Apple CarPlay is wireless.
Outside, the Thunder is distinguishable by its bullbar with mounted Lightforce LED light bar, fender flares, side steps and its sports bar up back over its electric roller tonneau cover.
The Pro Pack adds manually adjustable Old Man Emu BP-51 suspension, featuring nitrogen-filled dampers with a remote reservoir, as well as round Lightforce spotlights joining the LED light bar and a snorkel.
The Thunder Pro has plenty of kit, but you’ll be shelling out plenty, too.
Under the bonnet
Foton Tunland
One of the Tunland’s strong points is its Euro 5-compliant 2.8-litre four-cylinder Cummins ISF turbo-diesel, which Foton claims is the first ute in the world to be powered by this engine. It delivers 130kW at 3600rpm and 365Nm across a pretty flexible 1600-3200rpm torque band.
The smooth-shifting six-speed German automatic behind it is from another premium OEM supplier in Friedrichshafen AG, better known as ZF. Its gearing and shift protocols are well matched to the engine’s characteristics, offering a choice of full-auto mode or sequential manual shifting. Console buttons also provide a choice of Economy, Sport or Snow driving modes.
American OEM giant Borg Warner supplies the part-time, dual-range 4x4 transfer case, while another major US supplier - Dana - has its stamp on the front drive-shafts and live rear axle assembly, featuring a 3.9:1 final drive and limited-slip differential. There’s no locking rear diff option available.
Mazda BT-50
The Thunder Pro comes with the bigger of the two engines available in the BT-50 range, shared with the related Isuzu D-Max.
The 3.0-litre Isuzu turbo-diesel four-cylinder unit is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission, driving all four wheels if you’ve got them locked in.
The engine makes a claimed 140kW and 450Nm, relatively standard for the segment, but the 3.0-litre engine is fairly well-regarded for its smoothness and reliability.
Efficiency
Foton Tunland
Foton’s official combined figure is 8.7L/100km but our ‘real world’ road test figures based on fuel bowser and trip meter readings came in at 12.2 (after 503km) and 12.1 (after 297km). Based on those figures, you could expect a driving range of around 620km from its 76-litre tank. However, after only 500km the fuel gauge needle was nudging the red zone and the low-fuel warning light came on, so we weren’t game to find out if there was another 100km-plus of driving available from the theoretical fuel remaining.Â
Mazda BT-50
Given how much bitumen (and gravel) we covered during testing the BT-50 Thunder Pro - around 1500km - putting the claimed fuel consumption figure to the test was paramount.
Mazda claims the BT-50 uses 8.0 litres for every 100km covered under a combined (urban, extra-urban) cycle WLTP test with the 3.0-litre engine and an automatic transmission.
It’s got a 76-litre fuel tank, which theoretically should mean a range of around 950km.
With much of our testing done on either highways or fairly rugged country roads, plus some driving in inner-city Melbourne and in some NSW rural centres, the test figure of bang-on 10.0L/100km feels like a fair indication of a real-world figure.
After more than 650km of driving I was able to fill up with a comfortable level of diesel still in the tank.
Important to mention one of the days of driving was plagued by constant heavy rain, and some of the roads between Melbourne and the guts of NSW have seen better days, so there was a fair bit of fluctuation in speed for long stretches.
Also, the Thunder Pro carries some extra weight and aerodynamic disadvantages in its features (bullbar, spotlights, snorkel, sports bar, etc) so you could likely better that figure in a lesser variant on a more consistent highway drive.
Driving
Foton Tunland
It’s a tight build free of rattles and squeaks, but the ride is too firm when empty or lightly loaded, particularly in the leaf-spring rear suspension which feels every small bump and delivers a sharp kick in your back over larger ones.
Otherwise, the chassis performance is more than adequate with its four-wheel disc brakes and steering that’s responsive and nicely weighted. Engine refinement and noise insulation are not best in class, but at highway speeds the combined engine, tyre and wind noise is certainly low enough to allow conversations without raised voices. The Cummins fairly lopes along here, with only 1800rpm at 100km/h and 2000rpm at 110km/h.
It’s also quite an agile and energetic performer around town, particularly in Sport mode. Maximum torque of 385Nm from the Cummins diesel is far from the strongest in this category, but the Tunland’s relatively low kerb weight helps to compensate for it with brisk getaways from standing starts and good throttle response in city and suburban driving.Â
To test its GVM rating we strapped 770kg into the load tub, which with driver was only about 50kg short of its 925kg payload limit. The rear springs compressed 50mm while the nose rose 18mm. This resulted in a near-level ride height and noticeably improved ride quality, with no major decline in steering or braking response. Â
With this load it was a competent performer on a variety of sealed and unsealed surfaces, including some bush tracks on which we engaged in both high and low range 4x4. Back on the bitumen, it also coped well with our two kilometre, 13 per cent gradient set climb, maintaining the 60km/h speed limit in third gear at 2250rpm all the way to the top.Â
Engine braking on the way down, though, was compromised by the auto transmission’s unusual shift protocols. With second gear manually selected (in sequential shift mode) it over-rode that selection and shifted up to third when the engine reached 3250rpm on over-run. We tried it again several times and got the same result.
Not sure if it’s an engine protection measure on Foton’s part (redline is 4000rpm) but it’s not a nice surprise when you’re heavily loaded on a steep descent and relying on engine braking to help restrain your speed.
Our only other gripes were poor radio reception on the AM band (too bad if you like talkback) and the cruise control, which stopped working during our test and would not switch back on.Â
Mazda BT-50
While the BT-50’s main rival, Ford’s Ranger (and the related VW Amarok), is often considered the class leader in road manners, the Thunder Pro’s Old Man Emu BP-51 suspension upgrade is a game-changer for the ute.
Even on particularly rough roads with brutal unexpected waterlogged potholes, the BT-50’s OME set-up managed to keep the ute on track and settled without letting crashy vibrations and forces enter the cabin too acutely.
Of course, the BT-50 is still a ladder-frame ute, and combining that with torrential rain in the middle of almost-nowhere isn't the right combination when it comes to leaning on a dual-cab’s dynamic ability.
But the braking and steering in the BT-50 are impressive for its category, both feeling well-sorted: the former firm and strong when needing to stop quickly, the latter light but communicative enough for purpose.
The Mazda doesn't feel too top-heavy in cornering, no wild pitching or rolling here. Stable on gravel, too, feeling sure-footed and only intervening with active stability control when necessary and in a measured way.Â
With just little old me and some overnight luggage, the BT-50’s engine wasn’t exactly pushed to its limits hauling the 2.2-tonne-plus ute up the Hume Highway at 110km/h. But even on twistier roads and under load up hills it never felt lacking.
Though not on this test, we’ve also tested the BT-50 under load and towing, both proving easy tasks for the ute.
Mostly low-RPM work and cruising contributed to its fairly efficient fuel figure mentioned above, but putting the right foot down a few times confirmed the 3.0-litre turbo-diesel has some decent muscle if needed.
Finally, and very much worth noting if the Pro Pack is why you’re reading this, the combination of Lightforce LED light bar and twin-spotlights is a must if you regularly drive at night through unlit regions of Australia.
As someone who grew up driving 4WDs with spotlights at night on interstate trips, the lights fitted to the Thunder Pro are impressive in their illumination, combining relatively wide light - perfect for ensuring you’re not caught out by surprise wildlife crossing your path - with the strong beams from the spotlights turning what seems like thousands of metres of road ahead into daylight.
Both sets of lights are controlled by buttons on the right of the steering wheel, useful for when you only need one, or when standard high-beams alone will do.
Safety
Foton Tunland
Its three-star (out of five) ANCAP safety rating is poor, with single airbags for driver and front passenger only.Â
Bosch electronic stability control includes brake-force distribution and hill-start assist, but there's no trailer sway control or AEB. The rear seat offers three head restraints and lap-sash belts. There are also ISOFIX attachments on the two outer seating positions, but no top tethers. Foton says it has identified differences in ISOFIX fittings between China and Australia, which it is now addressing for future export models.Â
Mazda BT-50
The BT-50 is a maximum five-star model, according to its 2022 ANCAP assessment, with a decent list of safety features standard across the range.
Auto emergency braking, blind spot monitoring, lane keep assist and emergency lane assist, adaptive cruise control with ‘stop and go’, lane departure warning and prevention, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, driver attention warning and even features like secondary collision reduction are all standard.
There are front and rear curtain, front driver and passenger, side front, farside (front centre) and knee (driver) airbags.
As mentioned, a lot of the driver assistance tech is well-calibrated.
Ownership
Foton Tunland
Expect a three year/100,000km warranty and service intervals of six months/10,000km whichever occurs first. Roadside assistance is also available.
Â
Mazda BT-50
Mazda has a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty for all its models, plus capped-price or pre-paid servicing plans offered over two-, three-, four- and five-year periods are available.
For the BT-50, servicing is scheduled for every 12 months or a lengthy 20,000km, whichever comes first. And the average cost per workshop visit (capped price) is $661, compared to $595 pre-paid.