Honda ZR-V VS Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Honda ZR-V
Likes
Dislikes
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Likes
- On-road refinement
- Off-road capability
- Modern, well-appointed cabin
Dislikes
- Seven-seater’s compromised boot
- Real-world fuel consumption
- Not what you’d call fast
Summary
Honda ZR-V
The Toyota RAV4 has plenty to answer for.
Firstly, it kicked off the whole mid-sized SUV craze 30 years ago, decimating hatch, sedan, wagon and coupe sales en masse, to change the way people thought about family cars.
Then, in 2019, the company launched the first mainstream hybrid SUV in Australia, opening up the electrification floodgates. Now everybody wants one.
Read more about
Think about that for one moment. Before the RAV4 hybrid, there were none bar expensive Lexuses like the NX and RX. Rav-dical!
Now there are over 15 different choices, with the Nissan X-Trail and Honda ZR-V hybrids being two of the newest on the scene.
We pit these fresh electrified mid-sized SUVs against each other to find out which might be right for you.
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | 2.0L |
Fuel Type | — |
Fuel Efficiency | 5L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Is there a more anticipated new car launch of this year? Since the 250 Series Prado’s development started in earnest back in 2022, there have been rumblings about what to expect.
And while the LandCruiser Prado might not be as strong a seller for Toyota as a HiLux or RAV4, it is crucial to get this one right. Not only does the Prado have to be tough enough for rural work, it needs to be slick, comfortable and desirable enough for family buyers who like the finer things in life.
Like a pair of RM Williams boots, then, the Prado needs to perform as well on the cattle station as it does in the boardroom.
Read more about
- 2025 Toyota Prado order system changes, but will it affect how and when your Toyota LandCruiser, Toyota RAV4 or Toyota Corolla Cross hybrid arrives?
- Can't afford the cheapest new Toyota? Aussie VP has the solution for those that want a Toyota alternative to the cut-price Kia Picanto, Suzuki Swift hybrid, MG ZS, Hyundai Venue, Mitsubishi ASX and more
- New Toyota LandCruiser FJ: Everything we know so far about the sub Toyota Prado and LandCruiser 300 Series four-wheel drive
The latest 250 Series model is off to a great start in the looks department with chic retro detailing and dramatic surfaces. But the Prado’s talent needs to run a lot deeper than just looks.
An all-new ‘GA-F’ frame shared with the bigger 300 Series, revised powertrain and fully overhauled cabin has our mouths watering. What better test for Toyota’s new family wagon than a hot, humid and harsh Kakadu National Park?
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | 2.8L turbo |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | 7.9L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Verdict
Honda ZR-V/10
You’re looking at are two of the very best medium-sized SUVs out there. Regardless of price and position. Honestly, either should bring many years of sterling service.
Which one is for you depends on what that service needs to be.
The X-Trail e-Power is the better family-car allrounder, hands down, because of offers way more metal for the money, making it roomier and more practical. It’s also quieter, for some of the time at least.
But the ZR-V is athletic, agile and involving in a way the Nissan could never be. It’s also better equipped at this price point. And despite being from half-a-segment below, it’s still competitively packaged and feels from a class above.
We should be comparing this charming Honda against the Audi Q5 Sportback and BMW X4, it’s that special.
Whichever you choose, Toyota really needs to pull something out of the box with the next-gen RAV4 to beat these two.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 8.5/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 8.6/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado8.8/10
The new Prado has nailed the brief. It manages to leap ahead in diametrically opposed areas; not only is it far more refined, comfortable and confident on road, it makes off-roading easier than ever before and can tow more weight.
While the cabin layout, design and practicality is mostly excellent, the seven-seat versions’ boot has issues. You may not be put off by the high load lip or uneven floor but I’d recommend properly poring over the new Prado in person before taking the plunge.
Despite carrying over an engine, it feels like the biggest step in Prado’s history. Expect the appeal of this effortless, rough-and-tumble 4WD wagon to resonate with Prado fans and a whole new urban buyer. Get ready to see an awful lot of these on Australian roads soon.
Note: CarsGuide attended this event as a guest of the manufacturer, with travel, accommodation and meals provided.
The drive route took place on the traditional lands of the Larrakia, Murumburr and Jawoyn people and CarsGuide pays our respects to Elders past and present. CarsGuide would also like to thank Joshua Hunter, a Jawoyn Traditional Owner of the Wurrkbarbara clan, for his generosity.
Design
Honda ZR-V
Before we kick off on design, here are two annoying facts about the Honda.
First off, apparently ZR-V stands for Gen-Z Recreational Vehicle. Trying hard much, Honda?
Or maybe not trying hard enough. In Australia, the ZR-V colour range is pitiful, with just five choices against the Nissan’s dozen.
Please, at least import the 'Aqua Green' and 'Petrol Blue', as offered in Japan. Or better still, inject some actual rainbow variety.
Anyway, rant over.
In almost every important dimension, the Nissan is usefully larger – by an additional 11mm in length (4680mm versus 4568mm), +105mm in height (1725mm v 1620mm) and +50mm in wheelbase (2705mm v 2655mm), while the ZR-V concedes just 1.0mm of ground clearance to the X-Trail’s 187mm.
Oddly, although the latter looks wider (and has more interior space to stretch), they’re actually the same overall width at 1840mm.
Visually, the ZR-V is like an SUV compilation greatest hits mishmash, with a bit of Maserati Grecale meets Ford Escape up front, a profile that whispers Porsche Macan and maybe Mazda CX-5, and a lot of Lexus RX at the rear.
That the designers have managed to make all that meld so well is an achievement in itself.
Meanwhile, the X-Trail’s tastiest angle is the rear-three-quarter, which also reveals the chunky wide stance, nice glass-to-body ratio and clean surfacing.
Up front, though, it’s looking fussy and even a bit dated already. Nissan’s facelifted this look (it’s a three-year old one) in North America, where it’s sold as the Rogue. Check it out. No better really.
And we’re still years away from seeing that happen here, as our models are made in Japan. Like with the ZR-V.
Overall, though, both are fine-looking SUVs, though the Nissan’s styling seems more original.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 8/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 8/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Sitting on Toyota’s GA-F ladder frame platform, the Prado’s dimensions have changed dramatically. With a 60mm longer wheelbase, Toyota has minimised the Prado’s front overhang giving the impression of having a wheel in each corner.
Looking back to the past helped influence the Prado’s appearance, with more horizontal and vertical surfaces. It has the appearance of beings carved back from a block of clay, with sharp lines in relief giving the shape tension and purpose.
By stepping the window line down 30mm and raising the seat position 20mm, Toyota has improved the sense of space inside the Prado’s cabin dramatically. Partially a nod to past LandCruisers, the new Prado is not only better looking, but more practical, too.
Practicality
Honda ZR-V
Advantage: X-Trail. Families seeking space in a larger-than-usual mid-sized SUV need look no further.
Before we go on, remember, our photos show the Ti but the base ST-L that matches the ZR-V LX’s price point features an 8.0-inch (rather than 12.3-inch) central screen, more-traditional analogue instrumentation cluster with a 7.0-inch TFT screen, non-leather seat trim and conventional, rather than camera, interior mirror.
Regardless, you’re also likely to notice how large and airy the X-Trail interior is, with easy access to all five seats thanks to very wide-opening doors, revealing an interior offering heaps of legroom, headroom and shoulder room.
Nissan – just like Honda – got its interior right, with most of the important stuff thoughtfully executed – superb build quality, broad yet comfy front seats, ample ventilation, an excellent driving position with good all-around vision and completely logical control and button layout/access.
There's also more storage than you would know what to do with. Big bottle holders in the doors is another boon.
Remember when the X-Trail’s dash used to have chilled/cupholders, a centrally-located analogue instrument binnacle and two storage cubbies on either side, all to give it a rugged and utilitarian 4x4 feel?
That’s all gone now, with our Ti being the most opulent in the series’ 23-year (and four iteration) history.
More high points? Attractive and yet hardy, the long, low instrument panel features premium finishes, backed up by a chunky little steering wheel, an informative and multi-configurable digital instrument cluster, bi-level centre console bisecting the front seats for a cosier feel, and a big central touchscreen that’s simple to figure out and operate.
Out back, the quite flat yet supportive rear seats are remarkable for being slide-able as well as reclinable, while – as with the Honda – occupants are treated to rear air outlets, USB-A and USB-C port access, a centre folding armrest with cupholders and even more bottle storage in the doors.
Plus – predictably – the deep side windows lend a lot of light and vision out, adding yet another dimension of family friendliness. The substantially larger CR-V would have been a better fit for this showdown.
That all said, it’s not as if Honda was sitting on its hands when creating the ZR-V’s interior.
Strangely enough, it’s not as tight inside as its smaller length and wheelbase measurements suggest – especially if you’re a human and not, say, a tumble dryer trying to be shoved in the back. More on that later.
Up front, the ZR-V is typical modern Honda, with a simple – say might even say sparse – dashboard layout that, with plenty of soft-feel surfaces and strip of honeycomb trim, manages to look classy as well as sensible.
The leather front seats are cushy and nicely bolstered, providing an absolutely superb and immersive driving position ahead of elegant and crystal-clear digitalised instrumentation.
Along with the thick-rimmed sports steering wheel with paddle shifters (for regen-braking effort), it feels inclusive in here, like you’re about to drive a low-slung sports sedan. Thin A-pillars provide better-than-usual forward vision, too.
However, over-the-shoulder vision is poor due to the slim side and back glasshouse, and the black trim does make it seem smaller inside than it actually is, while having no factory sunroof availability – even as an option – is an oversight. That would at least shower the cabin with more light.
On the other hand, a high-set digital speed readout renders the absent head-up display almost superfluous, the cupholders, smartphone charger pad and under-console shelf are thoughtfully placed, the climate control is beautifully intuitive to operate and the tactility of the toggle and switchgear controls are right up there with luxury car alternatives.
Likewise, the back-seat area is also inviting, with ample room for even taller adults, proving the ZR-V’s rear isn’t cramped, just cosy due to the well-padded seating and high window line.
And the backrest has a 40/20/40 split, meaning the centre bit can be folded down for additional longer-load-through accessibility from the back. Great for skis or broomsticks.
Note, though, that, unlike in the X-Trail, neither the base nor backrest slide or recline, respectively, it’s dark enough to be a gloomy Smiths album out back, the back doors can’t hold a bottle, there are no overhead grab handles, and what’s with that fiddly roof-mounted centre rear lap/sash seat belt location?
Further back, it’s a no-brainer... on paper.
The X-Trail trumps the ZR-V with 205 litres more cargo capacity at 575L versus 370L. But in reality, both offer a decently-sized opening to help make loading bulky things inside easy.
There are low flat floors with sufficient depth and width for plenty of gear and a few nooks and crannies for additional items.
Keep in mind that neither carry spare wheels. You get a can of goo and an air pump instead. Not good enough for many rural drivers.
And that X-Trail hybrid's boot space is 10L less than the five-seat petrol-only versions, but much bigger than the 465L offered up in the seven-seat variants (also petrol-only). And speaking of internal combustion processes…
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 9/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 8/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Only two grades of Prado are available in five-seat guise, the GX and off-road focused Altitude. And although, on paper, the seven-seat option makes more sense, it brings one of the Prado’s biggest flaws.
Toyota quotes a vast 906L space with the third-row folded in seven-seat versions (and much smaller 182L space will all seats up) but the reality is less appealing. Because Toyota had to package the 'V-Active' system’s battery under the boot floor, the sixth and seventh seats sit proud about 100mm when folded.
A flimsy plastic riser box with storage space brings the floor level up when the third row is stowed. It may be a good spot for wet swimmers or valuables, but it dramatically increases load height. It is also only rated to carry a maximum 60kg load. The third row can’t be easily removed, either. This isn’t the most elegant solution.
The Prado’s five-seat layout is more practical for touring than the small increase in boot space (954L) suggests, with a lower load threshold and more useable space. Fold the second row flat and the load area is close to, if not quite, flat, and space increases to 1895L (1829L in the seven-seat).
Payloads take a circa-100kg nosedive coinciding with a weight increase of about 270kg over the old car to between 2495-2595kg.
It means the Prado 250 Series can only carry between 580kg (Altitude) and 615g (GXL) before breaking over the gross vehicle mass (GVM) rating.
Still, improved chassis stiffness and a new transmission mean the braked towing capacity jumps 500kg to 3500kg.
And then we come back to the overwhelming positives in the Prado which continues in the cabin which is leaps and bounds ahead of its predecessor.
That said, it doesn’t go overly-digital like GWM’s Tank 500, maintaining physical controls for low-range, locking diffs, drive modes, crawl control and, most important of all, the HVAC and seat temperature controls.
Every Prado has 12 cupholders, including two in the front centre console. The door bins are a little small but a refrigerated centre cubby (GXL and above) means you can keep bottles of water nice and cool.
Material quality is stand-out, even the GX has lashings of squidgy rubber and synthetic leather trimmings on the dashboard and door cards. GXL and above get squishy knee-pads on the transmission tunnel, too. Only the too-low armrests and a driving position geared towards shorter drivers are worth the smallest of complaints. The seats, though, are very comfortable no matter the grade.
The Prado’s second row has plenty of knee room for me (188cm) but the floor is set quite high, compromising comfort for taller occupants. There’s also hard plastic cladding on the transmission tunnel that impacts middle seat comfort. A fold-down armrest, 60/40 split backrest with several levels of recline, third climate zone (in GXL and above), face-height vents, two USB-C charge points and a 12-volt socket mean it’s pretty comfy in the back.
With tumble-forward second-row seats and a big, square door mean getting into the Prado’s third row is easier than before and simpler than a Ford Everest. Once back there you’ll find four more cupholders, two USB-C charge points and adjustable backrest decline. Again, the high floor means it isn’t suitable for carrying seven adults great distances.
For child seats, the Prado has ISOFIX tabs on the outboard second row seats and a total of three top tether anchors for the second row.
Price and features
Honda ZR-V
Now, hang on. Wouldn’t it make more sense to simply compare the X-Trail e-Power with the recently-released Honda CR-V e:HEV RS range-topper?
They are, after all, roughly the same size.
And the answer would be yes, except the new CR-V hybrid is $60,000 drive-away, while you can buy a base X-Trail ST-L e-Power from under $55K drive-away… which just happens to be exactly how much the ZR-V e:HEV LX costs.
Do please keep in mind that cheaper versions of both Hondas are in the pipeline for Australia.
So, what are these hybrid mid-sized SUVs like, then?
Released in mid-2023 and based on the excellent Civic hatch, the ZR-V is the new kid on the block. And – starting at $54,900 drive-away – what it lacks in size against the X-Trail is more than made-up for in features.
Now, at this price point, both feature plenty of safety, including Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB), blind-spot alert, lane-keep assist systems and adaptive cruise control with full stop-go functionality.
Additionally, you’ll find heated front seats, dual-zone climate control, wired Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, privacy glass, 18-inch alloys and a full suite of driver-assist safety systems including emergency braking, adaptive cruise control and surround-view cameras.
But considering the X-Trail ST-L costs the same price as the ZR-V LX, it lacks the latter’s 12-speaker Bose audio upgrade, leather upholstery, heated steering wheel, powered front-passenger seat, heated rear seats, wireless Apple CarPlay, wireless charger, reverse-tilt exterior mirrors, interior air purifier and hands-free powered tailgate with walkaway closing.
For an electric tailgate, leather and smartphone charger, you’ll need to step up to X-Trail Ti e-Power (as tested) from $54,690, before on-road costs, or just under $60K when drive-away costs are factored in, giving the ZR-V LX hybrid a handy $5K start.
However, the Ti does bring its own little exclusive luxuries, like tri-zone climate control, adaptive matrix LED headlights, a panoramic sunroof, exterior-mirror camera view, and 19-inch alloys – though you’ll need to fork out for the range-topping X-Trail Ti-L from $57,160, before on-road costs, (or nearly $63K drive-away to more-fully match most of the ZR-V LX hybrid’s spec.)
Advantage Honda. But, like we said, the Nissan has great big size on its side. And it has two electric motors for all-wheel drive – something the ZR-V has no reply for.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 9/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 9/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Grade for grade, the 2025 Toyota Prado has jumped in price significantly with the GX $9670 more than before and top-spec Kakadu $12,552 dearer.
Despite the same basic engine, there is justification with classier recycled cloth upholstery in the five-seat GX ($72,500), ice cold dual-zone climate control, a strong 10-speaker sound system and 18-inch alloy wheels.
Auto LED headlights, manual seat adjustment, keyless entry, auto wipers, five USB-C charge points, a 7.0-inch digital driver’s display and generous 12.3-inch multimedia touchscreen with 12 months of Toyota connected services along with wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto make the GX feel like a mighty complete specification.
That said, it still has manual seat adjustment, a urethane steering wheel and rubber floor mats but then it is the workhorse. Practicalities like 12 cupholders and 220-volt three-pin power outlet in the boot mean it’s fit for purpose.
The Prado GXL ($79,990) is what most will think of as the minimum family trim with roof rails, a power tailgate with rear window hatch, heated and ventilated front seats, synthetic leather upholstery, eight-way power adjust driver’s seat, leather-accented steering wheel and shifter, a total of seven USB-C charge points and a wireless smartphone charger.
The next step is the VX; a more luxurious urban-oriented trim that gets a different (and a little ugly) ‘Lux’ front grille reminiscent of the old Prado, 20-inch alloy wheels, body colour wheel arch and body trims and Bi-LED headlights with auto levelling and high beam.
For its near-$90K asking price the VX’s cabin bumps the digital cluster to 12.3 inches, adds leather-accented upholstery, power lumbar adjust for the driver, four-way power passenger adjust (without height), a refrigerated centre cubby, carpet floor mats, power-adjust steering column, a 14-speaker JBL sound system — that isn’t a huge upgrade — and terrain monitoring cameras.
Visually closer to the GXL with the square grille and ‘TOYOTA’ lettering, the $92,700 (before on-road costs) Altitude is Toyota’s off-road focused model. It’s also probably the best looking, available in two exclusive paint colours ('Tanami Taupe' and 'Ningaloo Blue') and riding on tough matt grey multi-spoke 18-inch alloys with Toyo Open Country all-terrain tyres.
Inside it’s much like the VX, though upgraded with a heated steering wheel, digital rear-view mirror and a sunroof. It loses tyre pressure monitoring, oddly, but picks up a locking rear differential, passive dampers and front stabiliser bar disconnect.
Right at the top of the tree is the Kakadu which pairs the VX’s exterior appearance with illuminated side steps, a panoramic sunroof, heated and ventilated rear outboard seats and a Torsen limited-slip rear differential.
Under the bonnet
Honda ZR-V
One of the biggest differences between these and the Toyota RAV4 hybrid is that these two contestants offer a significantly fuller EV experience.
Why? The Nissan’s petrol engine never powers any of the driven wheels, but instead drives one or both electric motors to make it all-wheel drive (AWD).
The Honda, meanwhile, uses its petrol engine to sometimes drive an electric motor, but mostly powers the front wheels, making it front-wheel drive (or 2WD in SUV marketing-speak).
Still, from behind the wheel, they’re remarkably similar in how they feel and behave, even if they sound completely different on the road.
For starters, both are no slouches, despite relying on a continuously variable transmission (the infamous CVT strikes again!) to drive these hybrid SUVs.
The X-Trail’s 1497cc 1.5-litre turbo triple produces 106kW of power at 4400rpm and 250Nm of torque at 2400rpm on its own, but with help from a power generator, inverter and twin electric motors (making 150kW on the front axle and 100kW on the rear), and its combined power and torque outputs are 157kW and 525Nm, respectively.
The latter happens from zero revs, since the electric motor is always doing the driving.
The ZR-V’s 1993cc 2.0-litre naturally aspirated four, meanwhile, delivers 104kW at 6000rpm and 186Nm at 4500rpm, but combined with the single 135kW motor, makes a combined 135kW and 315Nm.
Now, this might seem like a free kick for the muscular X-Trail, but the power-to-weight ratio difference evens the score more than you might expect: the 1.9-tonne (1903kg) Nissan pumps out 82.6kW/tonne, compared to our 1.6-tonne (1586kg) Honda’s 85.1kW/tonne.
The result? The latter’s 300kg-plus advantage and lower, sleeker shape means that, against our stopwatch, there was very little in it between the two hybrids – 7.1 vs 7.6s in favour of the gutsier Nissan. But it was only about 0.2s for most of that, until the X-Trail’s extra torque finally overcame that extra mass.
That said, during our 70-100km/h overtaking manoeuvre, both needed 2.9s, again highlighting the Honda’s lightness, while braking hard from 100-0km/h the ZR-V stopped three metres shorter at 39.2m. Again, blame the Nissan’s weight.
Keeping all that performance in check in both SUVs, by the way, are MacPherson-style struts up front and a multi-link rear end.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 9/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 9/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
This is not a hybrid, I repeat, not a hybrid. That’s what Toyota keeps saying, at least, even though the Prado’s 48-volt ‘V-Active’ Australian-honed integrated starter generator system is what some other manufacturers call ‘hybrid’, or ‘mild hybrid’.
There’s an 8.4kW/65Nm electric motor generator powered by a small 4.3Ahr battery that contributes to mildly improved acceleration and extended stop-start cycles. Toyota says changes have been made to the diesel engine, including a new turbocharger, higher flow injectors and changes to the block and head.
None of the tweaks increase the Prado’s ‘1GD-FTV’ 2.8-litre turbo-diesel four-cylinder’s power and torque outputs beyond 150kW (at 3000-3400rpm) and 500Nm (1600-2800rpm).
Turbo-diesel V6s in the Ford Everest and larger LandCruiser 300 Series easily outpunch the Prado, yet it still makes assured progress when lightly loaded. Additionally, the suppression of the engine’s vibrations and noise is much improved.
A new eight-speed automatic transmission gets a lower first gear ratio and taller cruising gears. Toyota says the shifts are 25 per cent faster than the old six-speed, from the driver's seat they feel slick and confident. There are fewer early down changes, too, making for a smoother drive.
Toyota does not claim a 0-100km/h sprint time for the new Prado but it doesn’t feel meaningfully quicker than the old car, which got there in a bit more than 10 seconds. The Prado will go onto a top speed between 165km/h (GX, GXL), 170km/h (VX, Kakadu) and 175km/h (Altitude).
Efficiency
Honda ZR-V
Here’s another key difference. Officially, the Honda averages 5.0 litres per 100km while the Nissan should average 6.1L. But in reality…
During our week with both hybrid SUVs that included a lot of inner-urban schlepping as well as spirited driving and repeated performance testing – which tends to sap the fuel – the ZR-V averaged 7.3L/100km versus 8.6 for the X-Trail.
Note that the latter requires the more-expensive 95 RON premium-unleaded brew, too.
For the record, the car’s computer read 6.1 in the Honda and 7.4 in the Nissan, while the official combined average carbon dioxide emissions figures are 114 and 139g/km respectively.
The latter’s 55L tank means it should theoretically achieve around 900km between refills, against its rival’s 1140km from a 57L tank.
And just in case you’re wondering, the X-Trail’s lithium-ion battery is pretty modest at 2.1kWh, but that’s exactly twice as large as the ZR-V’s. Neither require to be plugged in, since - as mentioned earlier - the petrol engines do the charging.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 8/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 9/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
For all that electrification and engine improvement, the new Prado’s combined consumption figure falls only a whisker from 7.9L/100km to 7.6L/100km. We saw about 10L/100km on the Prado’s trip computer during a mix of rural highway and dirt road driving.
To combat NOx emissions, the Prado’s Euro 5 compliant diesel now gets a 17.4-litre AdBlue tank. Toyota says the Prado will use around a litre of AdBlue every 500km, meaning it will need a top up once every 8500km, depending on driving style and conditions.
The other thing to note about the 250 Series is its reduced fuel capacity. Having only an underslung full-size spare wheel and battery to package means no extra tank and a maximum of 110 litres of diesel onboard, instead of 150L. That’s still easily enough for a 1000km driving range from a fill-up, though.
Driving
Honda ZR-V
If you were taking either of these mid-sized hybrid SUVs on a short test-drive around urban streets, you might be forgiven for thinking the way they go and feel is almost indistinguishable.
Light, ultra-smooth and responsive all the way.
At lower speeds, both are easy to park, with sufficiently tight turning circles and aided by the surround-view cameras that shouldn’t be an issue for anybody to accurately place. Plus, there’s a decent degree of ride comfort to enjoy as well.
Understandably, for most folk behind the wheel, they’d struggle to them apart, truthfully.
Thankfully, we pride ourselves for going beyond the test drive, and after hundreds of kilometres testing both vigorously, interchanging between the two regularly, their distinct personalities and traits become crystal clear.
Nissan first.
The X-Trail e-Power e-4orce is a formidable machine. It’s also truly an EV in the way it delivers its electric power from the motor only to the wheels. When that small battery is all juiced up, you’d never know this was anything else but.
Off-the-line acceleration is instantaneous, and grin-inducingly strong if you’re not expecting the immediate surge forward that follows, accompanied by that electric whirr as the Nissan punches through the air.
That big motor generates a formidable amount of torque that’s always on tap for effortless momentum and oomph as required. It feels like a much-more expensive machine, and is just as refined to boot.
So, it comes as a surprise at first when that 1.5-litre turbo triple does chime in, breaking the relative mechanical silence with a constant drone. Briefly if not so quietly working in the background at first, it keeps the battery charged up from a certain point, and then just as quickly extinguishes, a bit like the refrigerator in your kitchen does.
And, so, the cycle continues of EV whoosh then white good hum. When you need more muscle – say, when overtaking – the engine kicks in again, but this time at a higher-set rev as it charges the battery with more urge, because it never drives the wheels, remember.
You don’t really feel the 2.0-tonne weight of the Ti e-Power in normal turning or cornering situations, because the steering is eager yet beautifully weighted, making this a sharp handler.
Likewise, with two electric motors shuffling torque to whichever axle needs it, there’s an exceptional level of road holding control, even across the often waterlogged roads that the late-spring weather showered upon. The Nissan is a perfectly safe and controllable long-distance grand tourer.
Muted tyre and road noise (wearing Dunlop Grand Trek 235/55R19 rubber), an effective ‘e-Pedal’ regenerative braking system that helps recharge the battery whilst bringing the car to a near stop, as well as nuanced traction and stability control intervention, are further bonuses that add to the enjoyment of riding and travelling in the Nissan.
However, while the around-town suspension comfort is impressive, larger bumps make themselves felt, as if the X-Trail’s springs have reached the limit of their absorption. Is that all that extra weight talking?
More annoyingly, when cruising along at speed in crosswinds, the steering can become a bit too sensitive, as the driver needs to make constant corrections to remain on the straight and narrow.
As a result, the car feels a little unsettled and nervous due to the slight but noticeable left-right pitching that ensues. One passenger described it as fidgety.
And, like many hybrid vehicles, including most of Toyota’s, the very effective brakes suffer from a wooden and artificial feel, meaning they can be a bit hard to moderate smoothly when applying.
Otherwise, the X-Trail is a pleasant and accomplished vehicle dynamically, and so a good all-around drive.
The ZR-V, however, is in another league.
The driver’s notes tell the story succinctly: “Lovely, smooth, linear and involving steering.” The Honda glides through corners with precision and ease, even at much higher speeds than most would attempt, backed up by plenty of grip and control.
And while there isn’t the AWD surety when conditions are wet, it still always felt planted and secure over our largely-wet test route.
Such dynamic athleticism suggests that ride comfort would be compromised, but on the smaller Bridgestone Alenza Enliten 225/55R18 tyres, the initial suspension firmness is tempered by an underlying suppleness and comfort that highlights a high degree of sophisticated suspension tuning.
The Honda truly is the driver’s hybrid SUV. More so than any other anywhere near its price point that springs to mind.
Because it’s largely a petrol-driven hybrid, rather than an EV with petrol-engine assistance like the Nissan, the ZR-V does not quite have that effortless all-electric torque to rely on, instead feeling more conventional in the way it delivers drive to the front wheels.
The 2.0L four's engagement after a brief all-EV driving period is seamless, by the way, and also typically-Honda in the way that it revs freely, sounding urgent as it delivers its torque consistently, even at low speeds.
Put your foot down more, and the electric assistance comes into play again, providing a decent whack of speed – more so than you might initially expect. And all of this is provided with a refinement and civility you’d expect in a much more premium machine.
Other plus points include yet another subtle traction/ESC tune over gravel tracks, but one with a degree of looseness for a bit of fun if the driver is up for it, paddles that provide some EV regen-braking e-Pedal-style to slow you down, and a nifty drive-mode toggle that can be easily prodded by the driver without distraction. A sign of the enthusiasts who engineered this sporty SUV.
The only fly in the Honda’s driving ointment is noise. Too much road roar over coarse chip surfaces, and excessive wind rush from the large exterior mirrors.
Otherwise, the ZR-V is exceptionally accomplished dynamically for any modern family vehicle, and not just a medium-sized hybrid SUV. Not perfect, but massively impressive and delightful.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 8/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 9/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
There’s no doubt the Prado has some niggling issues but none of them manage to compromise the driving experience. It is head and shoulders above the vehicle it replaces and a perfect complement to the bigger 300 Series.
Immediately I noticed the light steering in the car park. This is the first LandCruiser product ever with electronic power-assisted steering (funny Toyota managed to hang on longer than Lotus).
No longer are you lumbering an over-sized tiller through your hands when zig-zagging between trees, the new 3.24 turn lock-to-lock system is light, accurate and makes the Prado instantly agile.
And yet when cruising pockmarked NT roads at the posted 130km/h speed limit there’s no dead-zone and plenty of heft off-centre to smoothly deal with crosswinds and cambers.
The other benefit is massively reduced kickback on high-speed dirt roads and when crawling over rocks. There really are no drawbacks here.
Despite its roughly brick-shaped frontal area the Prado manages to cut its way quietly through the air with no whistling mirrors or trim pieces. The eight cabin mount cushions have been revised to further eliminate suspension feedback in the driver’s seat.
Braking is strong with improved four-piston front calipers clamping 354x32mm ventilated front rotors and single piston sliders wrapped around 335x20mm ventilated rear discs.
The ride is superb with passive dampers and 18-inch alloys as on GX, GXL and Altitude. Excellent bump absorption meets a confident posture through high-speed corners. On dirt, the Prado deals with surprise drainage ditches and pot holes beautifully with no more than a dull thud reaching occupants.
With adaptive dampers, the 20-inch alloy-wheeled VX and Kakadu have five on-road drive modes instead of three: 'Eco', 'Comfort', 'Sport', 'Sport S+' and configurable 'Custom'. In Comfort, low-speed plushness is next level with almost friction-free travel over speed humps and knobbly rocks.
Things can get busy on really bumpy roads at 100km/h-plus in Comfort, so it’s best to trade some of that lush travel for Normal’s increased body control. Sport and Sport S+ make the dampers firmer and transmission more aggressive, though this doesn’t suit the Prado’s long-legged charm.
Toyota has hit the nail on the head for on-road dynamics and comfort, then, but what about capability on rough tracks and trails?
The basics are all present and accounted for. All Prados have permanent four-wheel drive, a low-range transfer case and locking centre differential.
Activating off-road aids is easy with switches all gathered near the gearshift on the centre console and they’re faster than ever — low-range engages in about two seconds and the centre differential now locks 24 per cent faster, says Toyota.
With track width increased by 79mm up front and 83mm at the rear and the longer wheelbase, the new Prado is more stable, too. A winding access road through Kakadu National Park with unsighted bends, bumps and mud-splashes highlighted the poise of the chassis and precision of steering, all inspiring huge confidence in the Prado’s abilities.
The four-link live rear axle remains with coil springs all-around remains but a newly-developed double wishbone front suspension with a longer stroke, greater caster and aluminium knuckles adds 10 per cent more front wheel articulation.
Approach angle improves to 31 degrees but departure drops to 17 degrees and wading depth is 700mm. While the 210mm ground clearance saw our GXL scratch its underbelly on a termite nest, the higher-riding VX, Altitude and Kakdu have a bit more breathing room at 221mm.
With a 30 per cent stronger body and frame, the local engineers who worked on the new Prado’s development claim the lack of locking rear diff in GXL and VX doesn’t impact the capability of the new 4WD. The main snag we noticed was the departure angle.
The GX and GXL get 'Downhill Assist Control' (DAC, high-range) and the clever 'Crawl Control' system (low-range) that works as an off-road cruise control, of sorts.
Using the drive mode select wheel, the speed of the car can be controlled without worry of bouncing around on the throttle or brake. Unlike the old system, the ABS pump is really quiet.
Adaptive damper-equipped trims and the Altitude get the latest iteration of Toyota’s well-regarded multi-terrain select. In high-range you can select 'Auto', 'Mud', 'Sand', 'Dirt' and 'Deep Snow' and in low range Auto, Mud, Sand and 'Rock', all of which augment traction control and response for the various conditions.
A mogul control program makes the ride smoother on bumpy terrain while the new 360-degree and terrain-view cameras show a feed from beneath the body to avoid nasty rocks.
The biggest challenge was dished out to the Altitude off-road flagship, with no GR Sport (at least for now). Equipped with all-terrain tyres, a locking rear differential (that actuates in just 0.15 seconds) and an electronic front stabiliser disconnect system that adds another 10 per cent front axle articulation, the Altitude absolutely cruised up, around and back down the rocky outcrop. We’ll need to find a bigger challenge.
The Altitude can be tricked up even further with Toyota genuine accessories, including a roo bar (with body colour option) and integrated winch. We’ll be sampling one early next year on our well-known off-road loop, so stay tuned to see how it compares to other rivals.
For now, what is impressive isn’t necessarily how far you can take the Prado on tricky terrain, but how calm and relaxed it feels eating up rough conditions.
Safety
Honda ZR-V
Only the X-Trail has an ANCAP crash test rating, and it’s achieved five stars, based on the smaller Qashqai “partner model”.
While ANCAP has yet to test the ZR-V, Euro NCAP recently awarded the Honda four out of five stars, citing it was “just below the five-star performance thresholds” due to slightly below-par adult side-impact protection where the front occupants’ heads can make contact, as well as safety-assist system anomalies whereby traffic-sign recognition and driver monitoring tech that do not default to ‘on’ or only operate above 45km/h, respectively.
Both models offer lots of driver-assist safety equipment, like Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) with pedestrian and cyclist detection, blind-spot alert, lane-keep assist systems, adaptive cruise control with full stop-go function, a driver fatigue monitor, auto high beams, traffic sign recognition, front/rear parking sensors, anti-lock braking system with brake assist, 'Electronic Brake-force Distribution', hill-start assist, stability control and traction control.
However, there are omissions: the Honda misses out on the Nissan’s rear AEB with pedestrian and cyclist calibration, while the Nissan’s seven airbag rating trails the Honda’s 11 – which includes full side airbag protection for outboard rear-seat occupants.
Both vehicles also include ISOFIX child-seat latches fitted to outboard rear seat positions, while a trio of top tethers for straps are included across the rear bench.
Note that Honda’s AEB system is operational from 5.0-180km/h according to Euro NCAP, the lane support systems work between 65-180km/h and the traffic-jam assist tech works between 0-72km/h.
The Nissan’s AEB kicks in from 5.0-130km/h, pedestrian and cyclist AEB from 5.0-80km/h, and the lane support systems work between 60-250km/h.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 9/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 8/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
More and more, safety is becoming a byword for systems that incessantly beep, bing and bong offering more a stressful soundscape than genuine help. In Prado's case, things are different.
It may not have an ANCAP crash safety rating yet, but as it is equipped with nine airbags, auto emergency braking, blind-spot monitoring, lane-keep assist, rear cross-traffic alert, driver-attention monitoring and occupant alert, the Prado is off to a strong start. All trims get these safety features, too.
The calibration suits Australian roads and driver standards with the only warnings we noticed being a few tugs at the steering wheel to stay within the lane markings and a gentle suggestion to take a break after two hours behind the wheel.
Plus, they’re pretty simple to disable. When off-roading, there’s a single button that disables those that can get intrusive on tight trails, such as low-speed AEB and rear cross-traffic alert.
You need to dive through the digital driver’s display to disable the parking sensors which sound like an RSL pokies room when you’re passing low-slung bushes.
The stability control (tweaked depending on drive mode) steps in gently to correct any wrong-doing on dirt and still lets you power out of boggy situations. Also, the ABS system is very effective and silent at work, helping keep the brake pedal feeling confident no matter the surface.
Ownership
Honda ZR-V
Both Nissan and Honda offer a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty that also includes roadside assistance.
But the ZR-V goes one better with a no-cost subscription to Honda Connect for remote vehicle operation, location and geo-fencing if required. Clever.
The Honda’s servicing intervals are every 12 months or 10,000km, with capped price servicing pegged at an annual flat fee of $199 for the first five years. That’s under $1000 over that period of time.
Nissan, meanwhile, matches all that, bar the 'Honda Connect' tech, and offers six years of capped-price servicing.
But at the five-year mark, the X-Trail e-Power costs over $1300 more than the ZR-V hybrid.
Nissan X-Trail Ti e-Power | 8/10 |
Honda ZR-V e:HEV LX | 9/10 |
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Toyota backs the Prado with a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty from the factory. Providing the 4WD is serviced on schedule, Toyota will extend this warranty to seven years.
Maintenance is due a little more regularly than your run-of-the-mill family seven-seater like a Toyota Kluger or Hyundai Palisade but that is to account for the Prado’s heavier use case. It is capped at $390 a visit with Toyota calling for the car to return every six months or 10,000km.
Another clever feature is the Prado’s front end, which is split into smaller sections including the fog light bezels, lower valance and grille, which can be replaced individually if damaged.