Mazda BT-50 VS Ford Transit
Mazda BT-50
Likes
- Civilised road manners for a ute
- Comfortable, practical cabin
- More engine than is needed
Dislikes
- Price
- Multimedia tech is dated
- Electric tonneau steals some load space
Ford Transit
Likes
- Zero emissions/near-silent operation
- Load-carrying ability
- Low servicing costs
Dislikes
- Six-figure price
- No tow rating
- No home-charging with wall socket
Summary
Mazda BT-50
This is one of the most expensive utes in its class. It’s more expensive than a Ford Ranger Platinum, a top-spec VW Amarok Adventura or even a V8-powered LandCruiser 70 Series - when you could still get one.
The reason? Mazda has ticked just about every box on this BT-50 Thunder, thanks to the addition of the 'Pro Pack'.
It’s designed to be plush on the inside while being capable and lifestyle-compatible when you’re outside. But does it do the job. or are there better options for what you need?
Read more about
- 'It's never mattered': Mazda not fazed about possibility of losing number two spot to Ford and maybe Kia, as 2024 Mazda CX-5 outsells Nissan X-Trail, Hyundai Tucson and Subaru Forester
- Mazda's confusing SUV plan explained: How the 2025 Mazda CX-70 and CX-80 will fit into the line-up alongside the CX-60 and CX-80, but which family hybrid SUV will be the biggest seller?
- RX-7 re-birth! Mazda Iconic SP headed for production green light, complete with 'pop-up' headlights and twin-rotor rotary EV power to take on Toyota Supra, Nissan Z
A week of driving this specced-up ute through some of Australia’s varying environments has helped us judge.
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | 3.0L turbo |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | 8L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Ford Transit
Ford has ventured into the pioneering world of battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) for commercial use with the launch of its E-Transit, which will compete for buyers in the Light Duty (3501-8000kg) segment of Australia’s Heavy Commercial market.
According to the company’s research, the new electrified member of its Transit fleet has a maximum driving range that’s more than double the average distance a typical commercial van travels each day in urban use.
So, we recently got behind the wheel for a week, focusing on the urban driving for which Ford claims the E-Transit is best suited (as opposed to long highway hauls), to see how it compares to diesel equivalents in its pure workhorse role.
Read more about
Â
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | — |
Fuel Type | Electric |
Fuel Efficiency | —L/100km |
Seating | 2 seats |
Verdict
Mazda BT-507.9/10
The BT-50 Thunder Pro is hard to fault as an option for a specced-up, comfortable dual-cab… aside from its price.
The benefits that come with the Pro Pack - its beefed-up suspension, snorkel and spotlights - are the sort of thing you’d expect a slightly more rugged off-roader to feature rather than a leather-upholstered ute with an electric tray cover.
While the suspension contributes to its smoothness on-road, there’s no question a much cheaper version of the BT-50 with the same OME BP-51 suspension upgrade (less than $7000 on Mazda’s accessories list by itself) would suit many buyers better.
After all, you’d hate to get mud all over that leather.
Ford Transit8/10
The E-Transit is quiet, comfortable, rides well, can handle heavy payloads, has zero emissions and would be well-suited to urban daily commercial use for which it’s been designed for. However, $104K-plus would be out of reach for many private owners and small businesses. That’s why Ford is aiming it primarily at fleet buyers, who will quickly determine the commercial success or failure of the E-Transit in Australia. Watch this space.
Â
Â
Design
Mazda BT-50
As it’s not quite on the podium of popular utes in Australia, the BT-50’s advantage is that it stands out a little more in ute-heavy traffic or on rural roads, especially in our test car's 'Red Volcano Mica' paint.
The BT-50 isn’t properly new, its design has become relatively familiar over the years, but it still boasts a modern look in the relatively slow-moving dual-cab ute world, especially compared to the likes of the Toyota HiLux.
Mazda’s well-liked SUV design DNA is on show here, but it blends in well with the ute’s overall shape, and the Thunder elements (perhaps aside from the ‘Thunder Pro’ decals) drew compliments in the city and outta town.
Inside, it’s a little easier to see the Isuzu D-Max twin’s influence, but the Thunder’s brown leather makes up for some otherwise unremarkable interior elements.Â
For a ute, it’s quite nice inside, though not quite up to high-spec Ford Ranger or VW Amarok standards. The multimedia screen looks a bit dated and feels it in use.
Ford Transit
Apart from the distinctive blue grille bars and rear-door badge, you’d struggle to pick the E-Transit from the closely-related 350L. However, underneath its work-focused exterior there are considerable differences.
Although it shares the same MacPherson strut front suspension and four-wheel disc brakes, the E-Transit’s 14.3-metre turning circle is 1.0-metre larger than the 350L.
And its electric motor and single-speed transmission are mounted under the floor between the rear wheels, which required design of a unique coil-spring independent rear suspension.
The long, wide and slim lithium-ion battery is tucked up neatly beneath the load floor, to ensure that the cargo volume matches the 350L. This also ensures that many load-area conversions will carry over to the E-Transit with minimal modifications.
The big battery brings a considerable increase in kerb weight, given the E-Transit weighs 231kg more than its 350L equivalent. So, although the E-Transit is the most powerful of the Transit fleet, it’s also the heaviest.
However, in terms of power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios based on kerb weights, it compares favourably.
For example, the diesel 350L has 19.3kg/kW compared to the E-Transit’s superior 13.3kg/kW, while the 350L’s 6.1kg/Nm is lineball with the E-Transit’s 6.2 figure.
The driver’s instrument display shows when the battery is being topped-up by regenerative braking and how much engine power is being used, ranging from 0 to 100 per cent.
It also displays average energy consumption (kWh/100km), remaining battery charge, projected driving range and other BEV-specific functions.
The cabin offers ample headroom, but those seated in the centre must have their feet in a split-level position with their right foot on the (now defunct) transmission hump and their left foot on the floor.
Price and features
Mazda BT-50
At $83,141, before on-road costs, the BT-50 Thunder Pro is $9046 more expensive than the standard Thunder on which it builds.
The Thunder being the otherwise top-spec model, starting at $74,095, before on-roads, is still itself up there with the likes of the Ford Ranger Wildtrak ($74,840) and Toyota HiLux GR Sport ($74,310), both toughened-up rivals in terms of their styling.
The Thunder already comes with a decent list of features, arguably more than most dual-cab buyers are looking for, so it would be an understatement to call the Thunder Pro ‘well-equipped’.
The Thunder’s list of standard equipment includes electrically adjustable driver’s seat, heated seats in leather up front, a leather-wrapped steering wheel, a 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreen, eight-speaker sound system and both 12-volt and USB-A plugs for devices. You’ll need the latter for Android Auto phone mirroring, because only Apple CarPlay is wireless.
Outside, the Thunder is distinguishable by its bullbar with mounted Lightforce LED light bar, fender flares, side steps and its sports bar up back over its electric roller tonneau cover.
The Pro Pack adds manually adjustable Old Man Emu BP-51 suspension, featuring nitrogen-filled dampers with a remote reservoir, as well as round Lightforce spotlights joining the LED light bar and a snorkel.
The Thunder Pro has plenty of kit, but you’ll be shelling out plenty, too.
Ford Transit
Our test vehicle is officially known as the 420L BEV Mid Roof, with 420 denoting its 4.2-tonne GVM (it’s actually 4.25-tonne), L denoting its long wheelbase and Mid Roof being one of two roof heights available, with the other being the optional High Roof variant.
Like its taller stablemate, our test vehicle comes with a 68kWh lithium-ion battery pack, electric motor and single-speed automatic transmission for a list price of $104,990 plus on-road costs.
For that money you could almost buy two diesel Transit 350L Auto equivalents. Even so, the E-Transit brings zero emissions, reduced noise and claimed lower operating and maintenance costs for business operators. With 198kW and 430Nm, it also has the most power and torque of any model in the Transit line-up.
It comes equipped with 16-inch steel wheels and 235/65R16C tyres plus a full-size spare, along with dark grey bumpers and side-mouldings in areas where scrapes and dents usually occur in hard-working vans. Factory options include dual side-sliding doors and more.
A steel bulkhead/cargo barrier separates the cargo bay from the cabin, which comes standard with a single driver’s seat and twin-passenger bench seat that are all heated.
The 10-way adjustable driver’s seat includes a fold-down inboard armrest, adjustable lumbar support and base-cushion rake.
Plus there’s a two-way adjustable steering wheel, power-folding and heated door mirrors, daytime running lights, three 12-volt accessory outlets, two USB ports, a reversing camera and rear parking sensors.
Its large 12-inch touchscreen is the gateway to numerous 'Sync 4'-connected services including the 'Ford Pass' app, which includes 'Power My Trip'.
By entering a destination, this app can consider the vehicle’s current state of charge in addition to real-time traffic conditions, to help identify charging stops when a customer will need them.
Under the bonnet
Mazda BT-50
The Thunder Pro comes with the bigger of the two engines available in the BT-50 range, shared with the related Isuzu D-Max.
The 3.0-litre Isuzu turbo-diesel four-cylinder unit is paired with a six-speed automatic transmission, driving all four wheels if you’ve got them locked in.
The engine makes a claimed 140kW and 450Nm, relatively standard for the segment, but the 3.0-litre engine is fairly well-regarded for its smoothness and reliability.
Ford Transit
Its rear-mounted electric motor produces an unmatched 198kW and 430Nm. The lithium-ion battery’s energy supply can be boosted by using the ‘Low’ setting on the rotary dial e-shifter to optimise regenerative braking.
There are three switchable drive modes including default 'Normal', energy-saving 'Eco' and 'Slippery' to improve traction in low-grip conditions.
The battery charge socket is located behind a spring-loaded flap in the grille and the E-Transit comes equipped with a Mode 3, 32-amp charge cable which is stored in the compartment under the passenger seats.
E-Transit can AC charge overnight, using a professionally-installed wall unit, in approximately eight hours at 11.3kW, or quick DC charge (15 to 80 per cent) at 115kW in approximately 34 minutes.
However, Ford does not supply a cable to allow overnight charging at home using a domestic wall socket. That’s because its targeting large fleet buyers, so the cable it supplies is only for ‘at depot’ charging or when using public-charging facilities.
Efficiency
Mazda BT-50
Given how much bitumen (and gravel) we covered during testing the BT-50 Thunder Pro - around 1500km - putting the claimed fuel consumption figure to the test was paramount.
Mazda claims the BT-50 uses 8.0 litres for every 100km covered under a combined (urban, extra-urban) cycle WLTP test with the 3.0-litre engine and an automatic transmission.
It’s got a 76-litre fuel tank, which theoretically should mean a range of around 950km.
With much of our testing done on either highways or fairly rugged country roads, plus some driving in inner-city Melbourne and in some NSW rural centres, the test figure of bang-on 10.0L/100km feels like a fair indication of a real-world figure.
After more than 650km of driving I was able to fill up with a comfortable level of diesel still in the tank.
Important to mention one of the days of driving was plagued by constant heavy rain, and some of the roads between Melbourne and the guts of NSW have seen better days, so there was a fair bit of fluctuation in speed for long stretches.
Also, the Thunder Pro carries some extra weight and aerodynamic disadvantages in its features (bullbar, spotlights, snorkel, sports bar, etc) so you could likely better that figure in a lesser variant on a more consistent highway drive.
Ford Transit
Ford claims an official WLTP driving range of 230-307km from a single charge. When we collected the E-Transit it was fully charged but the projected driving range displayed on the instrument panel was only 179km, so there are variables in these figures.
However, we did end up inadvertently testing the single-charge driving range because we could not charge the E-Transit. That was due to our local public-charging facilities being located inside multi-storey carparks which could not be accessed due to height restrictions.
So, during the week we drove a total of 190km, with about 19km of range remaining. Therefore, it is capable of at least 200km on a single charge but 300km seems optimistic, which is nothing new given the equally optimistic L/100km figures automakers claim for combustion-engine vehicles.
We used the Low drive mode most of the time to optimise battery top-ups through regenerative braking and our testing included a mix of city and suburban roads, both unladen and when hauling a big payload.
Average consumption was 28kWh/100km, so we would suggest a 'real world' driving range of around 200-230km from a single charge.
Driving
Mazda BT-50
While the BT-50’s main rival, Ford’s Ranger (and the related VW Amarok), is often considered the class leader in road manners, the Thunder Pro’s Old Man Emu BP-51 suspension upgrade is a game-changer for the ute.
Even on particularly rough roads with brutal unexpected waterlogged potholes, the BT-50’s OME set-up managed to keep the ute on track and settled without letting crashy vibrations and forces enter the cabin too acutely.
Of course, the BT-50 is still a ladder-frame ute, and combining that with torrential rain in the middle of almost-nowhere isn't the right combination when it comes to leaning on a dual-cab’s dynamic ability.
But the braking and steering in the BT-50 are impressive for its category, both feeling well-sorted: the former firm and strong when needing to stop quickly, the latter light but communicative enough for purpose.
The Mazda doesn't feel too top-heavy in cornering, no wild pitching or rolling here. Stable on gravel, too, feeling sure-footed and only intervening with active stability control when necessary and in a measured way.Â
With just little old me and some overnight luggage, the BT-50’s engine wasn’t exactly pushed to its limits hauling the 2.2-tonne-plus ute up the Hume Highway at 110km/h. But even on twistier roads and under load up hills it never felt lacking.
Though not on this test, we’ve also tested the BT-50 under load and towing, both proving easy tasks for the ute.
Mostly low-RPM work and cruising contributed to its fairly efficient fuel figure mentioned above, but putting the right foot down a few times confirmed the 3.0-litre turbo-diesel has some decent muscle if needed.
Finally, and very much worth noting if the Pro Pack is why you’re reading this, the combination of Lightforce LED light bar and twin-spotlights is a must if you regularly drive at night through unlit regions of Australia.
As someone who grew up driving 4WDs with spotlights at night on interstate trips, the lights fitted to the Thunder Pro are impressive in their illumination, combining relatively wide light - perfect for ensuring you’re not caught out by surprise wildlife crossing your path - with the strong beams from the spotlights turning what seems like thousands of metres of road ahead into daylight.
Both sets of lights are controlled by buttons on the right of the steering wheel, useful for when you only need one, or when standard high-beams alone will do.
Ford Transit
It offers a comfortable and commanding driving position, thanks to the multi-adjustable seat, two-way steering wheel adjustment and clear eye-lines to the big truck-style door mirrors with lower sections offering wide-angle views.
You don’t need to warm-up the engine to generate cabin heating - it’s instant. And when you get underway it feels more like you're riding in a tram than a van, with its muted electric hum the closest we’ve come to driving a silent commercial vehicle.
With the big battery under the floor it feels firmly planted on the road when unladen, with a low centre of gravity providing good stability when cornering.
The battery weight, combined with E-Transit’s unique four-coil suspension, iron out the bumps and provide a supple ride quality.
Acceleration from standing starts is brisk and smooth in Normal mode, even though you can sense its 2.6-tonne kerb weight's slight reluctance to get moving even with 430Nm of instant torque. At 100km/h, there’s only tyre noise and a little wind-buffeting around the door mirrors.
We drove the first 100km in Normal mode, during which average consumption was 27kWh/100km. We then switched to Eco mode, which resulted in a drop in performance without a corresponding decrease in consumption. Perhaps you need to drive it longer in Eco to harvest the benefits.
We then switched back to Normal mode for our GVM test. We forklifted 1300kg into the cargo bay which with driver equalled a total payload of 1400kg, which was still more than 200kg under its GVM limit. The rear suspension compressed 50mm with ample travel remaining, while the nose rose 35mm in response.
The compressed suspension felt firmer, as you’d expect, but the electric motor hardly noticed this load around town, with acceleration and general response remaining strong if slightly subdued. Energy consumption increased to 28kWh/100km during our load run.
In strictly city driving, which the E-Transit is aimed at, it proved to be a capable workhorse. It can do the job quite economically, too, given that during most of our testing in Normal mode it was operating in the 0-50 per cent ‘power usage’ zone which provides ample performance.
Safety
Mazda BT-50
The BT-50 is a maximum five-star model, according to its 2022 ANCAP assessment, with a decent list of safety features standard across the range.
Auto emergency braking, blind spot monitoring, lane keep assist and emergency lane assist, adaptive cruise control with ‘stop and go’, lane departure warning and prevention, rear cross-traffic alert, front and rear parking sensors, driver attention warning and even features like secondary collision reduction are all standard.
There are front and rear curtain, front driver and passenger, side front, farside (front centre) and knee (driver) airbags.
As mentioned, a lot of the driver assistance tech is well-calibrated.
Ford Transit
ANCAP is not applicable to heavy commercial vehicles but the E-Transit shares the same six airbags and active safety and driver assistance as other Transits.
Highlights include AEB with pedestrian detection, adaptive cruise control, blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert, lane-keeping assist, traffic sign recognition, a reversing camera, rear parking sensors and more.
Ownership
Mazda BT-50
Mazda has a five-year/unlimited kilometre warranty for all its models, plus capped-price or pre-paid servicing plans offered over two-, three-, four- and five-year periods are available.
For the BT-50, servicing is scheduled for every 12 months or a lengthy 20,000km, whichever comes first. And the average cost per workshop visit (capped price) is $661, compared to $595 pre-paid.
Ford Transit
The E-Transit is covered by a five-year/unlimited km warranty plus a separate warranty for the lithium-ion battery and high-voltage electrical components of eight years/160,000km, whichever occurs first.
Capped-price service intervals are 12 months/30,000km, with a total cost for the first five scheduled services of $925 or just $185 per service. Such low maintenance costs are in stark contrast to the purchase price!