Mitsubishi Triton VS Isuzu D-Max
Mitsubishi Triton
Likes
Dislikes
Isuzu D-Max
Likes
- Enhanced suspension improves dynamics
- Good-looking design inside and out
- A respectable on-road/off-road compromise
Dislikes
- No performance improvements
- Lacks some rivals' electronic 4x4 tech
- Interior needs more differentiation from LS-U
Summary
Mitsubishi Triton
So, you’re looking for a dual-cab ute. You want something that can do it all. Tough, family friendly, and right in the sweet spot when it comes to price.
You’re also looking for something a little different to Australia’s two favourites, the Ford Ranger and Toyota HiLux. Maybe you find them too expensive, maybe you find them too popular, or maybe you find the HiLux too old and the Ranger too digital.
For this test, we’ve grabbed the next two down in terms of popularity. Both are built by Japanese automakers in Thailand, and both have a reputation for being as tough as they come.
Read more about
- Beefed-up ute approved for Australia: Isuzu D-Max Blade gets Walkinshaw treatment to take on the Toyota HiLux GR Sport, Nissan Navara Warrior and maybe even Ford Ranger Raptor
- Iconic badges to return? Mitsubishi Lancer and Montero nameplates trademarked in the US suggest Nissan Patrol twinned Pajero and Nissan Leaf relation are coming
- Will the new 2025 Kia Tasman ute be a hit? We examine whether newcomers such as the BYD Shark plug-in hybrid ute can match the might of the Ford Ranger and Toyota HiLux | Analysis
On the one hand, we’ve got the new-generation Mitsubishi Triton in GLS form, and on the other, we’ve got the facelifted Isuzu D-Max in LS-U+ form. Both are well-equipped dual-cabs in 4x4 form which sit second from the top of their respective ranges.
Will we be able to crown one a winner for work, play, and family duties? Read on to find out.
Safety rating | |
---|---|
Engine Type | 3.0L turbo |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | 8L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Isuzu D-Max
These days, all the cool kids are buying utes that look like they’ve been working out.
They stand out with their toned bodies, muscular stance, rugged boots and ready-for-action names, like Warrior, Rogue, Thunder and – of course – Raptor.
Such suffixes are far sexier than just Navara, HiLux, BT-50 and Ranger, respectively.
Read more about
- New hybrid ute revealed but will it come to Australia? 2025 Isuzu D-Max gets mild-hybrid in Thailand but no confirmation for Toyota HiLux and Ford Ranger rival's local release
- Special Walkinshaw tuned Isuzu D-Max edges closer: 2025 Isuzu D-Max Blade ute to take fight to Nissan Navara Pro-4X Warrior and Toyota HiLux GR Sport
- Special new Isuzu 4WD revealed: Popular 2025 Isuzu MU-X off-road SUV gears up with a touring and towing-focused package to battle the Ford Everest and Mitsubishi Pajero Sport
Now, Australia’s third best-selling ute, the Isuzu D-Max, joins the club with the Blade.
Is it fit enough to run with the other pumped-up utes?
Let’s find out.
Safety rating | — |
---|---|
Engine Type | — |
Fuel Type | Diesel |
Fuel Efficiency | —L/100km |
Seating | 5 seats |
Verdict
Mitsubishi Triton/10
It’s a tough test for two tough utes, which are more evenly matched than we first expected. It’s clear both also make great alternatives to the HiLux or Ranger.
The Triton’s asking price is more affordable. It has solid ownership terms as well as a sleek, modern, and spacious cabin. It also has a higher payload and a handful of additional safety kit. On value (and our scoring system) alone, it’s hard not to award it the win.
However, this doesn’t make the D-Max a loser by any stretch. It impressed in areas I didn’t expect. Its cabin is more comfortable even though it doesn’t feel as big. It boasts a better ride quality and faster, smoother power delivery when compared to the Triton. After our rigorous testing, it was the ute I subjectively preferred driving home in at the end of the day.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Price and specs | 8 | 7 |
Practicality | 8 | 7 |
Design | 8 | 7 |
Engine and transmission | 7 | 8 |
Fuel consumption | 7 | 7 |
Driving | 7 | 8 |
Safety | 9 | 8 |
Ownership | 9 | 8 |
Final score | 7.9 | 7.5 |
Isuzu D-Max8.1/10
As with so many Australian-enhanced utes that rely on local expertise steeped in our once-flourishing automotive industry, the Blade improves the D-Max breed.
In fact, there is no doubt that it is the best D-Max ever sold in Australia – Holden-badged Rodeos and Colorados included.
Is the Blade class-best? Maybe not. But it does not seem to be far behind on first acquaintance. It also looks great and offers decent value for money.
What Walkinshaw has done to the D-Max's on-road dynamics as well as off-road capability quantifiably elevates the Isuzu ute. We’re impressed.
Design
Mitsubishi Triton
Both versions of these utes arrived this year, one a new-generation, the other a facelift.
We’re straying into subjective territory as always with design, but to me the Triton gets an advantage. Clearly its latest generation has been cause for a blank canvas redesign, and the result is a much more contemporary looking vehicle from the outside.
Its light profile, imposing width and wheel stance, as well as its tidy body panels make it stand out from the crowd, particularly at its price point. Sure, it doesn’t have the brash American appeal of the Ranger, but it looks more modern than the facelifted D-Max on this test at any rate.
On the inside it continues its modern look and feel, and also features plenty of clever little design touches to push Mitsubishi’s diamond theme. This is reflected in surprising places, like the knurling on the volume dial or reflected in the headrests of the seats. The cabin feels spacious and wide, and is brightened up a bit with a tasteful smatter of silver in the cool bar-style vents. It also features bright and sharp screens with decent if uninspired software.
Meanwhile the D-Max stays the course for this update with a slightly more aggressive treatment in its grille and rear light clusters. Its overall visage is one of a conservative ute which plays it quite safe in terms of design queues. It does keep with the tough reputation of the D-Max badge, but in my opinion runs the risk of feeling a little dated with so many newer-looking options on the market, ranging from its Triton rival here to the Ranger and VW Amarok.
This tough but rugged theme continues on the inside, with a few redeeming features that may surprise you. On the whole it’s a bit of a greyscale space with plenty of hard plastics, but there are soft-touch surfaces in all the right places which offer a bit more sponge than those in the Triton. It also manages to maintain Isuzu’s current hexagonal design motif, which is reflected in the wheel, buttons, dash cluster and even the seats.Â
For this update the D-Max also has an improved software suite, although it’s still a bit clumsy in terms of its layout compared to the simple menus in the Triton.
Which seats are better for spending time in? Despite its more rugged appeal, I was surprised to find the D-Max had the better of the two seats simply because you sink into them more. Even the leather trim on its steering wheel is softer and nicer to hold.
Do we have a winner? Despite the D-Max proving to be quite comfortable, in terms of aesthetics and providing a modern, spacious cabin, it’s the Triton.
Isuzu D-Max
Dating back to 2019, the current, D-Max range underwent a fairly robust facelift for the 2024 model year, with a restyled bonnet, grille, bumpers and tail-lights amongst other alterations.
Walkinshaw was privy to the changes during the Blade’s development many months out from its global debut, designing a larger and more protruding front grille featuring a hexapod motif and bigger badge.
It also adds black cladding on the bumper and side steps, and a curved 112-Watt light bar for dramatically improved nighttime illumination.
Those wider wheels and tracks, as well as that raised ground clearance, have also necessitated new, 23mm-wider wheel-arch flares, complete with additional cooling. The ones over the rear wheels are lower, too, to provide a more balanced aesthetic given the relatively modest wheel size.
The Blade’s rear sports bar is also a Walkinshaw design.
Satin black replaces chrome where appropriate, including on the door handles, mirrors and badges, while Isuzu brands the Blade with Japanese ‘Katana’ motifs across the doors and tailgate.
Finally, stepping inside the cabin, you’ll find ‘Blade’ embroidered on the headrests and floor mats, and etched into the door sills, while a numbered plaque is fitted in the console.
Otherwise, it’s all LS-U in there. Which is no bad thing.
Practicality
Mitsubishi Triton
Dimensionally, the Triton is longer and taller but slightly narrower than the D-Max (although, it does not feel it), while the D-Max actually gets a longer but much narrower tray. See the full dimensions in our table below.
In terms of storage and adjustability in the cab these two are quite evenly matched. Both offer eight-way power adjust seats in the spec tested, and both offer telescopic adjust for the steering column. Both get large bottle holders in the doors and in the centre console, although without adjustable ridges, neither are perfect when it comes to holding different sized bottles.
Only the Triton scores a wireless charging bay below its climate controls, while it also offers a larger centre console box.
Both have easily adjustable screens with the new-generation Triton committing nicely to dials for tuning and volume, and the D-Max notably re-introducing them for this update. Again, the Triton’s software is more simply laid out, and its screens are brighter and sharper than the units in the D-Max.
Both cars score an array of easy-access toggles on a dedicated climate panel, saving you the need to negotiate with touchscreen menus, so they’re evenly matched on that front.
The rear seat is differentiated mainly by the additional width seemingly on offer in the Triton, which feels as though it could seat an adult in the middle position in relative comfort. It scores bottle holders in the doors and drop-down armrest, as well as two USB-A ports on the back of the centre console and adjustable air vents in the roof. Additionally, the Triton gets a clever set of pockets on the back of the passenger seat suited to various device sizes. I fit quite comfortably behind my own 182cm tall driving position in the Triton, although I did feel as though I was seated very far off the ground.
Meanwhile the D-Max’s rear seat offers the same spongy seat trim as in the front seats, although overall it feels narrower than the Triton. It, too, scores bottle holders in the doors and two additional small ones in the drop-down armrest, although it only offers a single USB-C outlet on the back of the centre console. There are also two adjustable air vents down there. And an odd little storage tray. Unlike the Triton, the D-Max comes with a bonus coat hook on the back of the front seat. It feels as though I have slightly less room in the D-Max, but it is still sufficient and just as comfortable.
The Triton has a noticeably larger tray than the D-Max. See the full figures in the table below, but the core part of the story is the Triton’s tray is much wider and offers more useful space between the arches, while the D-Max’ tray turns out to be slightly longer. Both come from the factory in this spec fitted with a plastic tub-liner, but neither come with a roller cover unless you delve into the options list.
Payload is nearly 100kg higher in the Triton compared to the D-Max, although both utes share the same rated towing capacity at 750kg unbraked and 3500kg braked. The Triton gets an alloy spare while the D-Max gets a steel spare.
Off-road prowess was not the focus of this Tradie Guide review, but if you’re curious to see the technical figures, they’re in the spec table below.
Do we have a practicality winner? Seems like the Triton gets ahead here slightly with its higher payload, wider tray, and more spacious-feeling cabin.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | MU-X LS-U+ 4x4 |
L x W x H | 5320mm x 1865mm x 1795mm | 5285mm x 1870mm x 1790mm |
Kerb weight | 2125kg | 2110kg |
Payload | 1075kg | 990kg |
Towing capacity b/ub | 750kg/3500kg | 750kg/3500kg |
Tub capacity L x W x H | 1555mm x 1545mm x 525mm | 1570mm x 1530mm x 490mm |
Tub Width between arches | 1135mm | 1122mm |
Spare | Full-size alloy | Full-size steel |
Tub liner | Y | Y |
Tonneau cover | N | N (ours fitted with a manual roller $3521.76) |
Off-Road
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Clearance | 228mm | 240mm |
Approach | 30.4 degrees | 30.5 degrees |
Departure | 22.8 degrees | 19 degrees |
Breakover | 23.4 degrees | 23.8 degrees |
Isuzu D-Max
Just in case you missed it, more features including additional USB ports, fresh trim materials and new displays headlined the MY24 D-Max facelift inside.
The most obvious mods centred around redesigned instrumentation and a new 9.0-inch touchscreen. Both gained significantly upgraded functionality, clarity (especially the now-digital reverse camera) and improved graphics, making them better and easier to understand and use.
While not quite as large or roomy inside as, say, a Ranger, the D-Max has stood the test of time well inside, with sufficient space, a good driving position and inviting front seats that provide good support over long distances.
Meanwhile, in the rear of the D-Max’s cabin, the three-person bench is adequately comfortable, while most expected items like USB ports, air-con vents and some under-cushion storage are provided. It’s all pretty civilised inside.
Out back, though, beyond a tub-liner, you will need to pay extra for a tonneau cover, while there are no extra side steps into the bed as per a Ranger, nor power points or surround lighting.
But then, again, this is meant to be a no-nonsense workhorse with extra 4x4 abilities.
It's also worth keeping in mind that the Blade has slightly lower payload capacity, down to 896kg from 985kg. However, it does maintain a 3500kg-braked/750kg-unbraked towing capacity.
Price and features
Mitsubishi Triton
First up, let’s talk price-tags. Usually, if you want all the luxuries without spending too much, this second-from-the-top variant is where it’s at, and our two competitors here are very closely matched.
Straight away, the Mitsubishi Triton GLS appears to get a clear advantage. At $59,090 before on-roads, it’s nearly $6000 more affordable than than its D-Max LS-U+ rival here, although to make it match spec-for-spec, you need to add $1580 to its price-tag for the Deluxe Pack which adds things like leather seat trim, heating, and power adjust for the driver.
Meanwhile, the D-Max LS-U+ needs no extras added, but is significantly more expensive, starting at $65,500. Our test example also had a manual roller cover fitted, which adds a further $3521.76 to the price, but doesn’t affect the outcome here as the Triton doesn’t get one as standard anyway.
Both of our utes here score 18-inch alloy wheels clad in highway terrain tyres (on the spec sheet, our test Triton had all-terrains for some reason), LED headlights, 9.0-inch multimedia touchscreens, 7.0-inch digital instrument elements, keyless entry with push-start, dual-zone climate, and side-steps.
Both get wireless Apple CarPlay connectivity, but only the D-Max gets wireless Android Auto (it’s wired in the Triton), however, the Triton hits back with its wireless phone charger which is missing from the D-Max. The D-Max also gets auto walk-away locking, but misses out on the auto folding mirrors the Triton gets. Technically, the D-Max has more speakers, but the Triton’s audio system sounded better.
Check out the table below for the full specs laid out neat and tidy.
In terms of which one is a winner here? They’re such a close match it’s too close to call on features alone, but the Triton’s price advantage, even with the Deluxe Pack, is hard to ignore.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 (Deluxe Pack) | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Price (MSRP) | $59,090 (+1580) | $65,500 |
Wheel size | 18-inch alloy | 18-inch alloy |
Tyre | Maxxis A/T | Bridgestone H/T |
LED headlights | Y | Y |
Multimedia screen | 9.0 inches | 9.0-inches |
Apple CarPlay/Android Auto | Wireless CarPlay, wired Android Auto | Wireless CarPlay and Android auto |
Wireless phone charger | Y | Â N |
Digital dash | No (7.0-inch info display) | Partial (7.0-inch centre) |
Seat trim | Leather (Deluxe Pack) | Leather |
Speakers | 6 | 8 |
Climate | Dual-zone | Dual-zone |
Power adjust | Driver (8-way - Deluxe Pack) | Driver (8-way) |
Heated seats | Front (Deluxe Pack) | Front |
Connectivity 1st row | USB-C, USB-A, 12v | 2x USB-C, 1x USB-A (Dashcam), 12v |
Connectivity 2nd row | 2x USB-A | 1 x USB-C |
Rear air vents | Y (roof) | Y (console) |
Keyless entry and push-start | Y | Y |
Sidesteps | Y | Y |
Auto walk-away lock | N | Y |
Auto-folding wing mirrors | Y | N |
Built | Thailand | Thailand |
Isuzu D-Max
Sitting at the very top of the D-Max range, the Blade starts at $76,990 drive-away. Now, that’s some $9000 more than the previous flagship, the continuing X-Terrain.
Keep in mind, though, that the Blade is actually based on the mid-range D-Max LS-U, that starts from almost $15,000 less.
And, as with the Warrior, Thunder, Rogue and Ford Ranger Tremor that Isuzu is chasing, you don’t get any more performance.
To refresh, the LS-U includes auto bi-LED headlights, keyless entry/start with auto walkaway locking, dual-zone climate control, leather/leatherette upholstery, heated and powered front seats, a 7.0-inch driver display, a 9.0-inch central touchscreen, a reverse camera, DAB+ digital radio, wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, a tub liner, tailgate assistance and a full-sized spare alloy wheel.
So, what does that extra $15K buy you?
Walkinshaw – formerly of HSV fame but more-recently responsible for the remanufactured (in Melbourne) Ram 1500, Chevrolet Silverado and Toyota Tundra full-sized utes – has brought some significant upgrades to the Blade, in an Australian-exclusive program that’s spanned three years, more than a dozen prototypes and over 100,000km of local testing.
Much of that was in the outback as well as the ex-Holden proving ground at Lang Lang.
Over the regular D-Max, changes include uprated suspension, better clearances, improved underbody protection and bolder visuals.
Kicking things off is a 22.5/25mm front/rear lift (though the coil spring rates remain) due to 16mm-larger Monroe 35mm MTV twin-tube dampers with lifted spring seats. Ground clearance is now 244mm (front) and 215mm (rear axle low point); approach, departure and breakover angles are 29.2 degrees, 19.2° and 25.2° respectively. Wading depth remains at 800mm.
The Blade debuts Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT 275/65R17 all-terrain tyres, new 17x8.5-inch flow-formed alloy wheels. As they incorporate a +17-degree offset, tracks are 32mm wider (to 1602mm).
Under the D-Max’s nose is a steel underbody protection bash plate that is double the thickness of the original at 3mm, while the revised load-rated recovery point system includes an integrated cross-member, which braces both chassis rails together for improved torsional rigidity and reduced deflection when under the maximum eight-tonne load from an angle of up to 35 degrees.
Kerb weight jumps to 2204kg, which is a 99kg increase over the LS-U.
With many being ex-Holden, Ford, Toyota and IVECO during their local full-vehicle manufacturing era, Walkinshaw’s 60-strong team of engineers, designers and automotive specialists in Clayton have modified a ute in a similar way, then, that Premcar has turned the Navara into the Warrior. Â
But does the Blade meet Isuzu Ute Australia’s (IUA) brief for improved or upgraded off-road ability, ground clearances, underbody protection, approach angles, lighting and aesthetics?
Keep reading.
Under the bonnet
Mitsubishi Triton
Our utes again seem quite evenly matched. Both have diesel engines, both have a six-speed automatic transmission, both have 4x4 capability with low-range transfer cases, and both have locking rear differentials. One, however, comes out on top when it comes to pure numbers.Â
The Triton uses an upgraded version of the engine used in the previous-generation truck. It still measures 2.4-litres of capacity across four cylinders, but is now twin-turbocharged. Total power comes to 150kW/470Nm and peak torque arrives from 1500rpm.
Meanwhile, the D-Max continues to employ its renowned 3.0-litre four-cylinder single-turbo engine from the brand’s light-duty commercial range, producing a sturdy 140kW/450Nm. Peak torque arrives from 1600rpm.
A winner? The Triton’s additional power is backed by a higher payload, so we’re inclined to hand the win to it, although there’s more to the story in the driving and load test section of this review.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Capacity | 2442cc | 2999cc |
Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
Turbo | Twin | Single |
Power | 150kW | 140kW |
Torque | 470Nm | 450Nm |
Transmission | Six-speed | Six-speed |
Diff locks | Rear | Rear |
Isuzu D-Max
Now, if you want more performance in your D-Max, the bad news is the Blade is no more powerful or torquier than the regular version with the same engine.
That, by the way, means it maintains the 3.0-litre four-cylinder direct-injection turbo-diesel engine, delivering 140kW of power at 3600rpm and 450Nm of torque between 1600-2600rpm.
Actually, given that the 2204kg (kerb) Blade seems to be about 100kg heavier than the LS-U equivalent, its power-to-weight ratio slips to 63.5kW/tonne (versus 66.5 in the donor ute).
But, while there aren’t any fancy new electronic AWD systems as per some rivals such as the Ranger, the newcomer continues with the same, trusty old six-speed automatic and part-time 4WD set-up.
Of course, the D-Max is also conventional in its body-on-frame construction, complete with (three-layer) leaf spring rear suspension set-up.
That said, the Blade behaves quite a bit differently both on and off road.
Efficiency
Mitsubishi Triton
We ran a distance-controlled fuel test on both vehicles in the kinds of conditions we reckon tradies will drive them in. This included about 65km straight through the middle of Sydney on expressways and high-traffic urban roads, then about 55km as part of a return journey on the freeway.
The results were interesting because both vehicles were very close but used less fuel than the official claim, check the table below for details.
Both can claim nearly 1000km on the official consumption numbers, and neither is a hero when it comes to carbon emissions - check the figures out in the table below. Only the Triton requires AdBlue which will occasionally need to be topped up.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Diesel consumption (official/combined) | 7.7L/100km | 8.0L/100km |
Diesel consumption (on-test) | 7.9L/100km | 7.8L/100km |
Fuel tank | 75L | 76L |
Est. driving range | 974km | 950km |
C02 | 203g/km | 207g/km |
AdBlue | Y | N |
Isuzu D-Max
Despite weight and body airflow differences, the Blade still uses the same amount of fuel as the regular D-Max, according to Isuzu.
This means 8.0L/100km in the combined average cycle, or 9.8 in the city and 6.8 on the highway runs. This translates to 207, 254 and 180g/km of carbon dioxide emissions respectively.
Or, seen another way, expect a theoretical range of about 950km from each 76-litre tankful of diesel.
What did our fuel trip meter read during the launch event? Around 11L/100km.
Driving
Mitsubishi Triton
Both utes on this test provide a very competent and nearly SUV-like experience, and while you can do even better in this segment with the likes of the Ford Ranger or Volkswagen Amarok, these two are very evenly matched. Still, there are some subtleties that may affect your choice.
Triton unladen driving
Starting with the Triton, and straight away you notice its excellent visibility and commanding driving position. The modern feel for the cabin is reflected in the driving experience thanks to a tidy layout, easy operation of screens and dials, and relatively straightforward software.
The steering is notably heavier in the Triton and it takes more effort to drive over longer periods of time, as a result it can be more fatiguing. It does lend itself to plenty of feel in the corners and on uneven terrain, however.
The ride is also firmer in the Triton. It can deal with undulations and larger bumps quite well, but smaller, sharper road imperfections were communicated to the cabin. On the other hand, the cabin feels overall more refined, with not as much road and engine noise making its way inside. The wider track on this new-generation version offered plenty of stability and confidence in the corners.
When it comes to deploying power the Triton certainly feels as strong as a dual-cab should, although a slight moment of additional lag required to actually get the power to the wheels was notable, even though technically peak torque arrives at lower rpm in the Triton. It leaves a feeling of the Triton needing to work harder than its rival despite its higher outputs on paper.
While the six-speed auto was also mostly as smooth as it should be, it can get caught off guard and take a moment to change up or down.
The safety systems in the Triton are reasonably well tuned. The example we tested scored a software update Mitsubishi deployed to address issues it had from the launch with an over-active driver monitoring suite. The result is good, with the system being mostly hands off. The tech was a bit confused by the use of sunglasses, however.
Its lane keep software was also more aggressive than the system in the D-Max on the rare occasion it intervened. These kinds of issues are quite common on modern SUVs and passenger vehicles, and as a symptom of being one of the first utes to fully deploy them, the Triton’s systems are a little imperfect.
On the whole we like the Triton. It’s a very modern drive experience, although it was interesting to find some parts aren't as smooth or seamless as its rival in this test.
D-Max unladen driving
The D-Max feels a bit more closed in than its Triton rival here in the cabin, with loads of dark trim and slightly more limited visibility out the rear compared to the Triton. It does have massive wing mirrors which offer a wide view of neighbouring lanes.
Somewhat frustratingly, the screens (both in the dash and multimedia screen) appear more dull than the ones in the Triton and more susceptible to glare. The software is better than the pre-facelift model and it’s faster, but still a bit clumsily laid out.
The D-Max starts to impress as soon as you set off, however. Its steering is much lighter than the Triton, but manages to maintain enough feel in the corners to imbue the driver with confidence.
The ride is also excellent. It’s comfortable and compliant over most bumps and imperfections, while maintains control without being bouncy. It has an element of the ladder chassis jiggle common among ladder frame vehicles, but hides it well.
The D-Max’ 4JJ3 3.0-litre engine is renowned for being simple and powerful, and this is especially clear when compared to its technically more powerful rival.
It feels as though the power is delivered more quickly and more smoothly than the Triton. The six-speed unit in the D-Max is slick and straightforward and seemingly never caught off-guard. Perhaps the only area where the D-Max trails the Triton in this respect is the amount of noise the physically larger engine generates. Cabin ambiance isn’t quite as nice in the D-Max generally.
Safety systems are also seemingly better tuned. Not a single safety system interfered with the drive experience in our entire time with the D-Max, which speaks well to those who like to be in full control.
To sum the D-Max up, it does almost everything when it comes to driving slightly better than the Triton. On top of this, its light steering and softer seats will leave you less fatigued at the end of the day.
Load test
While we didn’t take our utes off-road for this review, we did load their trays up to see how they would handle work duties. Our new friends at BC Sands in Sydney’s Taren Point helped us out by lending us 500kg of firewood and some of their expert forklift operators to make this test possible, check them out here.
In total we had 500kg of firewood in the tray and two occupants in the cab for about 660kg on board of both vehicles. From there we took them on the same 13km loop which involved roundabouts, T-junctions, speed bumps, downhill and uphill stints as well as a brief jaunt on a multi-lane expressway.
First we loaded up the D-Max. Its narrower tray made it harder for the forklift operator to drop the bag of wood in, and once loaded its suspension compressed a significant amount.
The edges of its tray proved useful for mounting ratchet straps, although it is notable how limiting the smaller distance between the wheel arches is and the amount of space the manual roller cover takes up. Our total 660kg load is about two-thirds of the D-Max’ total permissible 990kg.
With the weight in the tray, the D-Max was initially unsettling, but confidence grew. This is because its big engine barely feels the additional weight and the suspension is capable enough to handle the mass despite the initial compression. While the softness feels like it requires caution in the corners, it handles additional compression from speed bumps, road imperfections and hills in its stride, with no secondary bouncing and a good amount of remaining ride comfort. The steering feels only slightly heavier with the additional weight.
After our short stint, the D-Max consumed 11.9L/100km according to its computer, which is reasonable.
Next up, we loaded the Triton. Its firmer springs did not compress as much as the D-Max, and the additional width in its tray made it significantly easier for the forklift operator to drop the bag of firewood in the tray.
The Triton seems more confident in its footing initially, with less compression and the additional track width making it feel as though it would be better than the D-Max. However, things changed as we drove it.
The Triton’s engine also barely feels the additional load, but does need to rev a smidge more. The transmission mostly copes well, although the odd occasion where it's caught out for a moment when changing up or down is more noticeable. The steering, which was already firm, remains unchanged.
The biggest issue the Triton faces is its suspension. With the additional load over the rear axle, large bumps cause a pogo effect with two or three secondary bounces after the initial compression. This particularly gnarly trait is what set it apart from the comparatively smoother D-Max.
The Triton claimed to use slightly less fuel than the D-Max under load on our short route, at 11.1L/100km.
Isuzu D-Max
Ever since the current-gen D-Max surfaced back for the 2021 model year, it's been widely regarded as a massive improvement over the previous version, especially in refinement, safety and dynamic behaviour.
You’d never call the 3.0-litre four-pot turbo-diesel quiet or sophisticated, but it is comparatively smooth and very gutsy. Strong off the line, it pulls hard and tows with effortless ease thanks to all that torque. The auto is also a good match, and rarely puts a foot wrong. As the Blade carries on with exactly the same powertrain, nothing changes here.
But, despite leading the class with its standardisation of advanced driver-assist safety tech, the regular D-Max is only a middling effort in terms of on steering, handling and ride qualities.
While light to use and easy to place, the steering has long felt remote compared to the class best, lacking feedback and precision; the suspension helps keep the ute grounded and in control, but the ride is too bumpy and jittery, which can become tiresome.
Plus, the adaptive cruise control and lane-keep safety systems have lacked precision and nuance in their operation, with the latter pin-balling from one side of the lane to another.
Now, the 2024 facelift aimed to address some of these criticisms with a raft of electronic driver-assist and traction-control upgrades, as well as continuous Australian-road tuning, to improve the D-Max’s dynamics.
How much of these contribute to the Blade’s enhanced driveability is not certain, but the net effect is considerable and palpable. Clearly, Walkinshaw’s touch has been transformative.
The new dampers make the driver feel more connected to the road, with better steering feel and response; the suspension rides over bumps with more suppleness for improved comfort, and it feels a little bit more controlled to boot. All this translates to a more enjoyable driving experience.
The Blade brings the D-Max closer to the class-best Ranger, if not quite close enough to be considered amongst the leaders. Still, it's a much better compromise than before.
But, what’s the newest Isuzu like off-road? After all, this is what the mods have been designed for.
Tested out at a 4x4 track in Adelaide, the Blade builds on the D-Max’s already impressive off-road ability, with that little bit of extra lift and ground clearances allowing for the ute to go that much further over challenging terrain.
Though it lacks some of the fancier features you find in some more-expensive machinery like under-vehicle camera views and automatic electronic 4WD mode selection, the basics are all there for serious 4WDing.  Â
Where the Blade stands out compared to regular D-Maxes is in its more comfortable and controlled ride, since the suspension seems to do a better job in dealing with the rough stuff while isolating its occupants from it.
This is quite remarkable considering that proper off-road tyres are not fitted, just Goodyear Wrangler Duratrac RT all-terrain rubber. They feel like an effective compromise for on- as well as off- road use.
All-up, then, the Blade is a better D-Max from behind the wheel.
Safety
Mitsubishi Triton
Safety equipment is impressive on both utes, which come with near-passenger car levels of active equipment.
Both score the now essential auto emergency braking, lane keep assist, and blind spot monitoring, as well as adaptive cruise control and driver monitoring, however, only the Triton comes with active driver monitoring as standard, and front cross-traffic alert as a no-cost option.
It is worth noting the lane keep software and the driver monitoring equipment in the Triton is significantly more sensitive than the equivalent technologies in the D-Max, and more annoying as a result.
Our Triton has the latest software update designed to abate the driver monitoring issues it had at launch, and while they are mostly addressed, the system still gets confused by sunglasses.
Both cars score reversing cameras and both have an impressive array of eight airbags.
The D-Max is covered by the maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating secured by the pre-facelift model in 2022, while the new-generation Triton only recently secured a maximum five-star ANCAP safety rating in 2024.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
AEB | Yes | Yes |
LKAS | Yes | Yes |
BSM | Yes | Yes |
RCTA | Yes | Yes |
FCTA | No-cost option | No |
Adaptive cruise | Yes | Yes |
Driver monitoring | Full monitoring | Attention alert |
TSR | Yes | Yes |
TPMS | Yes | Yes |
Reversing camera | Yes, reverse only | Yes, reverse only |
Airbags | 8 | 8 |
ANCAP | Five stars (2024) | Five stars (2022) |
Isuzu D-Max
The Blade hasn’t been tested for an ANCAP crash-test rating, but the rest of the D-Max range scores five stars.
Remember that the Isuzu was first ute in Australia with a wide suite of advanced driver-assist tech as standard.
For 2025, it now includes autonomous emergency braking (AEB) with pedestrian, cyclist and backover detection, as well as turn-assist and forward collision warning. This operates between 8-160km/h.
You’ll also find lane-support tech as part of the advanced driver-assist systems, that works between 60-130km/h. Included here are 'intelligent' adaptive cruise control, lane-departure alert/keep, emergency lane keeping, blind spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert and brake.
Like all D-Maxes, the Blade also comes with traffic sign recognition, trailer sway control and eight airbags, as well as ISOFIX latches and child-seat tether points in the back seat.
Ownership
Mitsubishi Triton
Ownership looks like a clear win to the Triton which is offered with a whopping 10-year and 200,000km warranty (conditional on the servicing being completed with Mitsubishi on time during this period.) It also offers a matching ten years of capped-price servicing (see details in the table below) and four years of roadside assist.
On the other hand, the D-Max shouldn’t be written off as it still offers above par ownership terms.
There’s six years and 150,000km of warranty coverage, five years of fixed-price servicing, and its roadside assist can be extended for up to seven years if you continue to service with Isuzu.
Both utes require servicing once every 12 months or 15,000km, whichever occurs first.
 | Triton GLS 4x4 | D-Max LS-U+ 4x4 |
Warranty | 10 years/200,000km | Six years/150,000km |
Fixed price servicing | Ten years | Five years |
Annual cost | $489 (5yrs) | $449 |
Service interval | 12 months/15,000km | 12 months/15,000km |
Roadside assist | Four years | Up to seven years |
Isuzu D-Max
Like all D-Maxes, the Blade offers five years of capped-price servicing, a six-year warranty with a 150,000km distance limit, and seven years of roadside assistance chucked in. IUA likes to call this its 5/6/7 plan.
Finally, service intervals are every year or at 15,000km intervals, with a capped-price servicing offer of $449 per visit.